Fsf-friends November 2003

fsf-friends@gnu.org.in

9 participants
24 discussions

[Fsf-friends] Re: Pitching free software directly before UN and other govt. circles
by Ramanraj K 20 Nov '03

20 Nov '03

Russell Nelson wrote: >Ramanraj K writes: > > understand that both are one and the same to us, from the point of view > > of the copyright law, the expression "free software" makes it plain that > > copying, sale, exhibition, installation, modification, redistribution, > > and trading are "free" with "free software" but these rights are > > "restricted to/by proprietor" in the case of proprietary software. > >Microsoft gives away free software. > > > The availability of source code, price, quality of software, > > development model etc. are qualites that cannot distinguish or > > differentiate our software from proprietary software. It would be > > in the best interests of our community to promote "free software" > > terminology in govt. circles to maintain clarity avoiding needless > > confusion. Hence this request. > >Sorry, but "free software" is inherently confusing. Why do you think >RMS always has to give his free speech/beer footnote? Why do you >think proprietary software companies give away free software? Because >they're our friends? I don't think so. > >The solution to all of this nonsense is to establish a certification >mark, which is what we've done. > >I don't want to continue this discussion. > > > Time alone can bring home the truth.

1 0

[Fsf-friends] Re: Pitching free software directly before UN and other govt. circles
by Ramanraj K 20 Nov '03

20 Nov '03

Russell Nelson wrote: >Ramanraj K writes: > > Would you consider pitching "free software" directly before the UN and > > other government circles? > >Probably not. You're re-opening a battle we don't want to fight. >Please accept that we'll call it open source, and you'll call it free >software, and that we both mean the same thing. > > > Dear Mr. Russell Nelson, You may market "free software" as "open source" to the business community, highlighting one of the basic inherent qualities of free software. The issue is if you would consider pitching "free software" directly as "free software" before the law, to clearly distinguish free software from proprietary software. Please do leisurely read the postings referred. Please do not view this as a fight or battle, between the movements, for our real enemy is proprietary software. Though I understand that both are one and the same to us, from the point of view of the copyright law, the expression "free software" makes it plain that copying, sale, exhibition, installation, modification, redistribution, and trading are "free" with "free software" but these rights are "restricted to/by proprietor" in the case of proprietary software. The availability of source code, price, quality of software, development model etc. are qualites that cannot distinguish or differentiate our software from proprietary software. It would be in the best interests of our community to promote "free software" terminology in govt. circles to maintain clarity avoiding needless confusion. Hence this request. Thanking you, Regards, K. Ramanraj.

1 0

[Fsf-friends] Pitching free software directly before UN and other govt circles
by Ramanraj K 20 Nov '03

20 Nov '03

Dear Mr. Eric Raymond, You would be interested in the following postings at fsf-friends that centered around "free software" vs "open source" terminology: http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-November/001238.html - I say "FLOSS" is meaningless. http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-November/001239.html - RMS says "FLOSS" is neutral. http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-November/001240.html - I say OSI is openly a pitch for marketing free software. http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-November/001242.html - RMS says "open source" terminology is superficial. http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-November/001244.html - I wrote why "open-source" cannot distinguish itself from proprietary software. Please see the table there. Then I suggest http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-November/001245.html - International Free Software Treaty Would you consider pitching "free software" directly before the UN and other government circles? Regards, K. Ramanraj.

1 0

Is an International Free Software Treaty possible?
by Ramanraj K 20 Nov '03

20 Nov '03

Under our laws, as they stand today, open source utterly fails to distinguish itself clearly from proprietary software, and our open source friends are now having a dose of their own medicine with proprietary software companies releasing source code and calling it "open source". Searching the internet for open source will return several links to non-free software claiming to be "open source". "Free" is a very uncomfortable word for proprietary software companies, who will never give users the freedom which free software gives. We cannot contain the free software movement within the confines of copyright law. It would be like trying to contain the ocean within the confines of our fist. The plain fact is that the free software movement has created its own vast expanse of space in the law, at a global scale. Recognition of free software could correctly be done only at a global scale. We are at a defining moment, like when America or India won its freedom. A great vision is needed to proceed and speed ahead in the right direction. If we fail to perceive and understand the significance of the free software movement, we merely push and put away significant progress and development possible with free software. An International Free Software Treaty, may be the first right step in this direction. The treaty may legally recognise the free software movement, its work, its scope and provide for its active use by the people of this world. RMS could be designated as an Ambassador of Free Software, entitled to immunities and privileges under International law. Adequate international funds could also be provided to promote the progress of the free software movement. The UN ought to be seriously interested because the much wider goals and objects of the UN will be well served by the achievements and aims of the focused free software movement.

1 0

Re: Light on Free Software
by Ramanraj K 18 Nov '03

18 Nov '03

> I wonder if we can think of any practical to measures arrest the > spread of "open source" terminology and associated superficial ideas > in government circles? The terminology that the law ought to use, while referring to software that negates the contituents of proprietary software is both interesting and important at this juncture. If governments use the expression "free software" fully understanding the philosophy of the free software movement, this discussion will be redundant. However, our open source friends are good at promoting free software, and now the stage has come when governments have started taking a serious interest in free software as it is of proven quality, open, saves costs, full of freedom desired by all interested in good governance. Since some governments use "open source" terminology, this discussion assumes importance. We have a duty to bring to the notice of governments which use "open source" terminology, the history of the free software movement, and the legal issues involved. The following is a very brief outline, that may be read along with the previous postings touching on this subject. According to the OED, "proprietary" means rights held in private ownership. Initially, only private individuals and entities created software and owned the rights in it. RMS wished to create software that will be free from this kind of private ownership. Free software was therefore a deliberate and intentional movement intended to negate the restrictions and hardships caused by private ownership of software. Now, the issue is: what would be the best expression in law to convey the idea that such software is free from restrictions imposed by private owners? RMS rightly called it "free software" from the time of its very inception. The chief ingredient of Free Software is that it is free from the oppressive and unscientific restrictions imposed by private ownership. The rights in respect of software are chiefly governed by copyright law. As soon as a person writes a software, by law he is vested with copyright over his software, regardless whether it is registered under a Copyright Act. By default all software are proprietary having an identifiable author in whom copyright for the work will vest. Usually, free software produced under the GNU Project is released from private ownership under the terms of the GNU General Public License. The Open Source Initiative started in 1998, chiefly by Eric Raymond, a hacker guru, argued that free software should be labelled as "open source" software. The initiative, has been successful in promoting the interests of free software, but it has also resulted in an acrimonious debate within the community about the logical classification to be adopted while describing software. The classification now competing for attention are: {free | proprietary} software -vs- {open | closed/secret } source software Fundamentally, Copyright law deals with the ownership and transfer of copyrights, and therefore software licences should be classified for the purposes of law only as free or proprietary. Please study the following: 1. Classification of Software Licences in law: software licences +-----------------+-----------------+ | | free proprietary 2. Table of Rights/Properties distinguishing the two classes: --------------------+--------------------+----------------------------- Right/Property Free Software Proprietary Software --------------------+--------------------+----------------------------- Part A: Rights/ingredients of Licence covered by Copyright Law Copying Free Restricted by/to Proprietor Redistribution Free Restricted Exhibition Free Restricted Installation Free Restricted Assignment Free Restricted Modification Free subject to Restricted making the modified version free as source Sale Free Restricted Hire Assignment itself Restricted Free Trading Free Restricted Importing Free Restricted Subsequent ownership Free Restricted Part B: Properties/ingredients not covered by Copyright Law: Avaliability of Free and Open Could be open or closed/secret Source Code Price Free Fancy prices/Cost if Honest /sometimes free for n days, x persons etc /minor software given free as a marketing tool but a whole workable system is never free Development Model Free and Open Restricted and Closed Prone to Virus Well Protected Weakly vulnerable Quality Unmatched ? Growth Potential High ? Documentation Free Restricted In short: sharing Free Restricted --------------------+--------------------+----------------------------- Please note the division of the above table into Part A, covering ingredients covered by Copyright Law and those that are not under Part B. Strictly speaking, the Copyright law does not look at the element of "price" or availability of "source code" at all. Open/Closed source classification further cannot clarify the question of ownership. To use such criteria to classify software licenses would therefore be inappropriate. Songs, movies, and other literary works are "open" and there is nothing secret about a song or literary works in the way, software could have public object code and secretable source code. Even if source code is revealed, the proprietary software could still say that under the terms of licence, it may not be copied or shared. Open/Closed source classification is therefore not appropriate. But we can say free software inherently has the quality of being open source, owing to the very nature of how free software is created and used. In other words, free software is a parent class, and being open souce is just one of its properties, or qualites. Right from its inception, the expression Free Software has meant a negation of all that constituted proprietary software. Software can therefore be intelligibly classified only as free or proprietary, where each class clearly and fully negates the other, for purposes of law. Further, this would be in consonance with the legal traditions of examining words in their historical context and setting. This is good news for our "open source" friends. Since the Open Source Initiative web site openly admits that they are marketing free software, obviously they are merely highlighting one aspect of free software: that its source is always open. Since they are using "open source" label openly as a sales pitch for marketing free software, they can happily continue with the same. However, when it comes to government, they can easily see the reason why law can deal only with free or proprietary software. But it would be ideal if all of us including the law, media, hackers, users and govenments uniformly use the expression "free software" everywhere, to maintain clarity and stand closer to truth. Regards, K. Ramanraj.

1 0

Re [Fsf-friends] Re: Light on Free Software
by doxa＠sancharnet.in 18 Nov '03

18 Nov '03

I wonder if we can think of any practical to measures to arrest the spread of "open source" terminology and associated superficial ideas in government circles? I think after Govt of Kerala's experience of introducing Free Software in Schools, the political leadership has become more aware of the complications within the terminology. The statements of the Opposition Leader of State Assembly of Kerala, issued through Press Release, contained "Free Software" (in The Hindu and "swatantra software" in the Deshabhimani) being used without any ambiguity. This shows that it is only a matter of time before this phrase catches up. CK Raju Thrissur

1 0

Light on Free Software
by Ramanraj K 17 Nov '03

17 Nov '03

I read the article titled "Groping in the dark ... ", by Frederick Noronha, in LINUX For You, November 2003, and thought some light should be thrown. Sorry, there are no links to the article on the world wide web. >The we-don't-need-to-promote-FLOSS attitude can lull everyone into a false sense >of over-confidence. People who could have used this technology effectively simply >don't get a chance to. ... the FLOSS fold has a special responsibility. Free software was born out of the need and necessity to break free from the tyranny and obstacles of proprietary software. Right from its inception, the expression Free Software has meant a negation of all that constituted proprietary software. Software can be intelligibly classified only as free or proprietary, where each class clearly and fully negates the other. The expression FLOSS was used in a survey and study financed under the European Commission's IST programme, which did a case study of Free/Libre Open Source Software, and the work done is available at http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS . The FLOSS study was started on June 1, 2001 and terminated on October 31, 2002. The concept of sharing which is innate and elementary in the free software movement, was researched by elaborate questionnaires! The FLOSS study report, while referring to PostgreSQL, says "it is mainly deployed in private use and projects not involving mission-critical business operations", which is plainly wrong. Several goverments and entities are developing live projects using PostgreSQL, that has a rich set of functions not available in even commercial database servers. The "FLOSS survey and study" is a gloss, when all relevant material is already available at www.gnu.org and www.opensource.org. Is FLOSS a technology? The expression FLOSS was used in the emperical study to refer to Free/Libre Open Source Software generally, and cannot be called a "technology". Even if the FLOSS study and report are useful to the European Commission, and to others, it would be no reason to use the expression FLOSS to refer to Free Software. If a new group props up from the community, calling Free Software as Public Software, reasoning that "public" is the best word to convey the intent of GPL, then would there be another study group, that surveys Free/Libre Open Public Source Software - FLOPSS? Would we then seek to replace FLOSS with FLOPSS? This would be endess and meaningless. We need to gracefully accept the historical background that led to the free software movement, and avoid inventing new expressions to maintain clarity and stay focused on the deeper goals and intents of Free Software. Some people freely dip into the Free Software Directory to meet needs, but openly refuse to give credit, or use the expression free software, which is only unfair. >The good thing about the meet is that it's [a symposium in Singapore] >trying to network all the FLOSS initiatives in this part of the globe and put >together a more reliable picture of what's hapenning At present, we can check into globally accessible servers, and download, use, modify, improve, and distribute free software. If spreading the use of free software is itself seen as a project, it would be ideal to adopt the same methods adopted to develop free software, by commencing a project at savannah or sourceforge, so that there can be global access and robust practices evolve. It may be a mere shell script that will download relevant software, and install the same in the user's server and this could keep count and create feedback channels. There are no sound reasons for isolating software use from software development, as both are essentially two sides of the same coin. If Asian projects on i18n, l10n, etc are operated from a few well known CVS foundries, then even persons with access to the internet, living in even remote villages, who clearly understand what is happening can make contributions that are globally relevant. Free software movement has incidentally promoted the principle of equality like never before. >Mastering technology is good but it's more important to be large-hearted when it comes to sharing it I hope that this is a reference to our friends who work for proprietary software. Quite obviously, free software is the ultimate in sharing, and it would be crude to accuse people who have contributed towards free software of not being large-hearted. >We could well convert this into a small self-serving club that doesn't grow ... A friend sent me a copy of Tarka Samgraha by Anambhatta, with its expository gloss on ancient Indian epistemology usually called Nyaya [Realism] + Vaisesika [Atomistic Pluralism]. The Indian works on logic were born, not through any gentle flaming, but through an intense burning desire to get to truth. Modern India's motto is a phrase from the Mundaka Upanishad: Sathyameva Jayethe, translated as "Truth Triumphs". The Upanishads are seen as a clear strarting point for studies on logic, and further works on the methods of arriving at the truth by reasoning developed and evolved gradually. The Nyaya Sutras were written by Gautama. The Vaisesika Sutras were by Kanada. Vatsyayana was the first author who explained the entire scheme of Indian epistemology, however, globally better known today for his Kama Sutra. The Tarka Samgraha is a dipika or commentary on the original older works. The Tarka translation in hand was rendered by Swami Virupakshananda of the Ramakrishna Math, Chennai. The opening quotation is: "Logic and grammar are indispensable aids for every branch of Knowledge". AI applications, even today, do not give grammar the importance it deserves. Long before Stephens drafted the Evidence Act in 1872, we had several works, dealing scientifically and comprehensively with primary evidence, verbal testimony, inference, deduction and these works were actually used in every day life. Nachiketa <-at the doorstep of-> Death, Gautama, Kanada, Vatsyayana, Anambhatta are a few names I have listed here, as associated with Indian epistemology. Now, could we call them as "self-serving" individuals who affixed their names to their works? Their works stand on their own, and we will carry forward the memory of the author along with the work, only if we accept their value. I am convinced they are an invaluable source, atleast, to improve my own Calpp: aided legal procedures and proceedings project. Calpp is the mission of my life, and I make no bones about it. The Calpp project could be seen as self-serving its author Ramanraj, but it could also be seen as serving real human needs. We will gain and grow a lot when Indian epistemology is available as part of free software. Section VII, of the Tarka Samgraha dealing with valid verbal testimony says: "Significative potency is the desire that a certain concept be understood from a certain word." Viewed from this angle, RMS, the founder of the free software movement desired the world to break free from proprietary licences and initiated the free software movement. The whole philosophy and concepts behind the movement stand elegantly loaded on the expression "free software". I hope that all of us can see the significance of the free software movement, and voluntarily use the expression "free software" instead of other expressions. Regards, K. Ramanraj.

2 3

Re: Paths of Freedom
by Ramanraj K 17 Nov '03

17 Nov '03

>The solution should better be called e-Administration. >It received an award from the Deputy Prime Minister of India. >The basic version can be made free. >We can discuss more, if you have any ideas on how to go about it. >Thanks. >Krishnan V D G Congratulations! Please do release your application as free software. www.gnu.org explains how it could be done. Briefly, by free we mean releasing the source code under the GPL. Regards, K. Ramanraj. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ramanraj K" <ramanraj(a)md4.vsnl.net.in> To: <fsf-friends(a)mm.gnu.org.in> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: [Fsf-friends] Paths of Freedom >> To, >> Mr. V D G Krishnan >> >> President & CEO >> LL2B.COM Pvt Ltd >> >> >> Dear Mr. V.D.G. Krishnan, >> > > >>> > The message copy received by me is not clear to me. >> >> >> >> First a pointer to where we are: Please visit >> http://gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2003-October >> Ofcourse, we are now in November, but I have given you last month's >> archive address so that you will find your mail listed there at the >> bottom, and you can relate to what is happening around. >> > > >>> >On our part, we have developed a e-governance and e-transparency solution >>> >which is now under trials at Electronics Corporation of Tamilnadu >> >> (ELCOT), >>> >Govt. of Tamilnadu Undertaking. This tool is expected to bring in total >>> >transparency and speed to the working of the Govt. We hope it will be >>> >adopted as a tool by the Govt. of Tamilnadu. >>> > >>> >You can visit WWW.LL2B.COM for the preliminary details. >> >> >> >> e-governance and e-transparency solutions are most welcome. But then, >> the solution itself should also be free, open and transparent. The >> philosophy section at http://www.gnu.org explains free software. Law >> itself is public, free and open in nature. Our Supreme Court had the >> occasion in Naresh v. State of Maharashtra [AIR 1967 SC 1] to consider >> the merits of open and public trials for "healthy objective and fair >> administration of justice," and quoted Bentham with approval as follows: >> >> "In the darkness of secrecy, sinister interest, and evil in every >> shape, have full swing. ... Publicity is the very soul of justice. >> It is the keenest spur to exertion, and the surest of all guards >> against improbity. It keeps the Judge himself while trying under >> trial in the sense that the security of securities is publicity." >> >> The principles laid are equally true for governance. Without free >> software, it is hard to even imagine a e-governance software. >> >> But, I am personally wary of using the expression "e-governance software". >> >> The law is the common background for all human activity. Besides >> governance, law operates upon a large area. Governance is specially >> grouped under the heading Constitutional Law and Administrative Law. We >> have Law of Contracts, Torts, Law of Property, Family Law, Labour Law >> etc. wherein "governance" is minimal or even totally absent. If an >> application can handle Constitutional Law and Administrative Law, then >> there are no reasons why it should not handle the Law of Contracts or >> the other laws. We have people designing "banking software", "insurance >> software", "billing software", as though the law has these water tight >> compartments. We have ERP, CRM, B2B, B2C, G2G, G2B, etc. etc, with >> others promising to integrate ERP with CRM, CRM with the rest in all >> possible permutations and combinations. It makes business sense but no >> legal sense. >> >> Can any e-governance software check constitutionality of code? If they >> can't, then they better not call themselves by such a name. >> >> Besides, consider the following: >> >> Suppose an e-governance application wants to assist litigants in filing >> plaints. While automating preparation of plaints, some issues arise. >> If more than one plaintiff sues, the script should use "plaintiffs" >> otherwise, "plaintiff". In appeals, for the same reason it chooses >> between "appellants" and "appellant". Soon, a function that would give >> the plural for singular nouns like applicant, petitioner, claimant, >> defendant, and respondent becomes necessary. This exercise soon takes >> one to examining the rules of English grammar. If an application can >> handle legal rules well, then it might handle rules of English grammar >> as well. But the most singular difficulty would be in listing the rules >> of English grammar. Tamil has Agathiam (the primary grammar text, but >> no longer in vogue) > Tholkappiam (Secondary text, based on Agathiam), >> and > finally the recent Nanool, where everything from how letters are >> formed, classified, pronounced, to usage, root words, verbs, >> concatanation, and every thing necessary to use the language are dealt >> with thoroughly. Assuming that after consensus, acceptable rules of >> English grammar for the present are available, we could write functions >> such as: >> >> function get_plural($singlular){ >> // returns plural for a given singular >> .... >> } >> >> To write a perfect get_plural function, we need to know if the word >> passed to the function is a noun or not. Now, we have to write >> >> function is_noun($word){ >> // returns if word is a noun >> .... >> } >> >> >> As you see, one thing leads to another, and soon we will have a large >> library of functions that deal with many aspects of English grammar. >> Then our scripts will write well, and may be read well too. >> >> Once we write such a library, there is no reason why this should be >> confined to just an "e-governance" application. We could use it even >> better in the field of education or wherever English is used. >> >> Consider another scenario. >> >> Recently, an ONGC helicopter crashed into the sea near Mumbai, and an >> Enquiry has been ordered into it. The survivor & eye witnesses reported >> that the helicopter went into a spin before crashing into the sea. It >> is well known that the tail propellor prevents a helicopter from >> spinning. Did the tail propellor fail? We see that the enquiry soon >> has to deal with the basic workings of an helicopter to arrive at the >> truth for the cause of the accident. Though at the top level, things >> look like "e-governance", as we go deep, we find ourselves into the >> thick of rules of English grammar, the laws of aerodynamics, history, or >> other fields of human knowledge. >> >> Ancient sages dealt exhaustively on grammar, philosophy, ethics, >> medicine, law, science and literature single handedly. Agathiar wrote >> Agathiam creating a script for Tamil, codifing the rules of grammar, and >> then dealt with medicine [Paripooranam 400], and initiated Girivalam, as >> the simplest form of yoga, that could be practiced by one and all. >> Agathiar is believed to have brought his first love, River Cauvery, to >> Tamil Nadu. Well, then he might have organised the flow of the River >> with the aid of the local kings. Patanjali wrote upon Sanskrit Grammar, >> Ayurveda and Yoga, and though the works stand distinctively, a common >> thread unites them. A unity at some point is required for scientific >> progress and human prosperity. >> >> Free software offers all the tools we can ask for. The next big step >> would be when human knowlege is ported across so that software >> applications abound with life, intelligence and wisdom. >> >> Regards, >> K. Ramanraj. >

1 0

LFY Nov 2003 * GNU/Linux updates from India ...
by Frederick Noronha (FN) 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

-------------------------------LINUX FOR YOUR Nov 2003 ----------------- Published from India, Vol 1 No 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Would you like to contribute articles to LFY? Contact Rahul Chopra below ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EDITORIAL: Star Office & is the latest version of (Sun's) office suite software. We tried it on both Windows and Linux -- and were impressed by its performance and features... Sun has given its battle cry against Microsoft. And, it couldn't be louder. The attach is on three fronts -- the office suite, the operating system and the enterprise server solution. -- Rahul Chopra LFYedit at efyindia.com * Fedora project updates * Kernel 2.6.0-test8 released * Slackware 9.1 arrives * Knoppix 3.3 is here * Linux device remote-controls UPS * SuSE Linux 9.0 released * New features to keep off worms * Samba 3.0 released * Athlon64 debuts * Mandrake Linux 9.2 launched * Linux-based digital media player rolls out * Novell connects Linux desktop users to MSExchange 2003 * XFce 4.0 lightweight desktop environment launched Major updates and releases: ClusterKnoppix v.3.2.2003-09-05-EN * DietLinux v0.1.2 * dyne:bolic v.1.0 * GNOPPIX v.0.5.4-1 * Mailman v 2.1.3 * Chandler IN INDIA a government program in the large state of Madhya Pradesh aims at providing computer-enabled education and teaching basic computer skills to students in primary and middle schools. The unique project harnesses the power of [GNU]Linux-based open source software. Stellar data recovery tool: Stellar Phoenix is a GNU/Linux data recovery tool that runs from Windows. It does a good job of recvering data, but comes at a price. If you manage a network of Linux desktops, then this is a must-have tool for you. CONTEST: Offer a good slogan and win a gold-plated watch. FEW C/C++ competitors exist for GCC in the world of GNU/Linux. Intel's C++ Compiler 7.0 is one such brave-heart. It fails GCC at some points, but by optimising code for faster performance, it has proved its worth. BhavyaOS: This CD which comes from the magazine promises "all the Red Hat 9 goodies compressed on a single CD". Feedback from users? Some problems have been reported in the past. INDIA MAY NOT be topping the charts in high performance computing. But with software and hardware costs dipping, a number of research organisations and government agencies are now deploying high performance clusters for innovative applications. OpenOffice WRITE HAS features that can help you track changes and save different versions of the same document, when you are working on it with others. OpenOffice Calc, a spreadsheet app, is filled with functions. How to use some of these functions is explained here. * Motorola and Real tie-up for Linux-phones * Samsung to develop Linux smart phones * SuSE to launch US$449 Linux server for small businesses * Criticism leads to Forrester policy change (towards vendor -sponsored research, following publication of a controversial Microsoft-funded study comparing the costs of Linux) * Analyst company disagrees with Sun's Linux strategy * Dell stands up for new Red Hat Linux * Windows developers feel Linux is more secure, as per study * Telstra selects Sun's Mad Hatter (Linux desktop) * Thai schools desert Microsoft products * Tetra Information Services is first partner for Linux Asia 2004 * HP to back Linux byers * Red Hat widens software choice * Linux users furious over Royal Bank SCO investment * Linux not accountable for security, Microsoft's Ballmer says * Ford mulling over change to Linux-based servers * SCO postpones deadline for taking Linux licences * More governments adopt Linux * NTT to link up with OSDL to develop Linux for telecom use INDIAN TRANSPORT sector treads cautiously on the Linux road. Most transport operators acknowledge the role of Linux-based software not only in cost cutting, but also in offering customers a better experience. However, investment costs, lack of support and knowhow are concerns of potential GNU/Linux users in this sector. IN INDIA, ON THE enterprise desktop front, many enterprises use Linux to manage crucial systems. But no IT decision-maker wants to place it on the desktop of the knowledge worker. Why is it so? FINLAND WORKS ON AN APPLIED Linux Institute: Three Finnish public institutions, including Linux Torvalds' alma mater, are setting up an institute for applied Linux, so that people can use and share open systems, which could also help create an environment empowering poeple in the North and the South. BHARTI TELETECH LTD decided to streamline its business processes, and so opted for GNU/Linux. The change not only saved costs but was easier to migrate to. The Bharti Group followed up by upgrading its other Microsoft-run systems to Linux as well. (CON)FIGURING OUT the IBM Directory Server (hands-on) SEVEN STEPS to software samadhi: Migration from Windows to GNU/Linux may take some time, but the process will be a great learning experience. And 'muft' (free-of-cost) and 'mukt' (freedom-based) software could be the best reward for your efforts, writes Linux Lingam. Don't ask what the pseudonym means! TIPS & TRICKS on networking: simple steps that will make you a pro at deploying firewalls, setting up NAT and even working with IP tunnelling. (Elaborate five-page how-to). GNUWinII CD: FREE YOUR WINDOWS> A review of the GNU WinII CD, which has a collection of free/libre and open source software for the Windows platform. Written by Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay. PARALLEL PROCESSING using Perl. You can write programs in Perl that run in parallel to carry out computationally-intensive tasks through two models, the process model and the threads model. KERNEL CORNER reviews the concept of the semaphore mechanism and demonstrates its application in a kernel program. Various kernel semaphore functions are discussed in detail. BOOKS REVIEWED IN BRIEF: * Assembly Language Step-By-Step: Programming with DOS and Linux, Rs 369 with CD, pp 613 * Linux Database Bible Rs 329 in India, pp 715 * Professional Red Hat Linux 9 Secrets Rs 499 with 2 CDs in India. Pp 1038 * Linux in Easy Steps, Rs 89, pp 186 * Beginning Red Hat Linux 9. Rs 379 with 2 CDs, Pp 570 SHELL CORNER: Learn more script features and functions to better control signals and processes. JAVA TIPS FOR your Linux PDA. Learn how to load and run a simple Java application on Sharp's SL-series Zaurus, the Linux-based PDA. FIREWALLING USING ipTABLES: Here's how to use iptables in Netfilter to guard your computer from intruders. GROPING IN THE DARK: Mastering technology is good, but it's more important to be large-hearted when it comes to sharing it, says the BraveGNUIndia column. NEWS FROM INDIA includes * Linare Linux Launched * Wind River releases tools for embedded Linux * Oracle rools out entry-level database for SMEs * Sun rolls out StarOffice 7.0 * IBM launches Lotus Notes and Domino 6.5 * Cadence moves PCB tools to Linux * Sun Microsystems launches Mad Hatter * First Indian distro with bio-informatics tools * Cincom Smalltalk VisualWorks environment for GNU/Linux THE PHD CHAMBER of Commerce and Industry and Tetra Information Services organised an all-day seminar on Linux Readiness: Emergence of a New Era in September at New Delhi. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LINUX ASIA meets in Delhi on Feb 11-13. See you there... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTACTS: LFY Delhi 26810602 or 26810603 http://www.linuxforu.com

1 0

Asian first-timers prefer GNU/Linux to Windows
by Frederick Noronha (FN) 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

ENTERPRISE Unix Roundup: A Linux Pioneer Gets Back in the Game Sever Watch, United States Last week we took a look at SUSE and Red Hat, two long-time Linux stalwarts entering distinctly new phases. This week, another Linux ... <http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3108641> ASIAN first-timers prefer Linux to Windows The Register, UK >From a report at Linux Insider, we learn why. First-time computer users are flocking to a government-subsidised programme to bring cheap PCs to the public. ... <http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33963.html> OSDL To Start Pushing on Desktop Linux Slashdot ... Review is reporting that 'IBM, Red Hat and a consortium of computer makers backed by the likes of Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Intel will push to move the Linux ... <http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/13/121205.shtml?tid=126&tid=152&tid=163&…> EMBEDDED Linux specialist SnapGear acquired by high-end firewall ... Linux News One of the world's first embedded Linux companies has just announced that it is being acquired (again). Embedded Linux security ... CyberGuard to Acquire SnapGear, Extending Product Line to Edge of ... <http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9335598499.html> ALCATEL to develop Linux 3G services Cellular-News Alcatel and Intel have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to jointly promote advanced mobile Internet applications using a Linux operating environment in ... <http://www.cellular-news.com/story/10105.shtml> WIN4LIN support announced for Fedora Linux Desktop Linux NeTraverse announced the immediate availability of Win4Lin for Fedora Linux. Win4Lin allows users to bridge from legacy Windows ... <http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS6351767204.html> LINUX operating system secures place on Middle East's technology ... AME Info, United Arab Emirates Industry evidence suggests that there has been a significant rise in the number of companies in the Middle East investigating the potential advantages of Linux ... <http://www.ameinfo.com/news/Detailed/31146.html> NOVELL'S Masie to Focus On Linux, Upliftment AllAfrica.com, Africa ... SA is a country with massive potential, saying he has big plans for the company and is really excited about the possibilities for the organisation's Linux ... <http://allafrica.com/stories/200311130514.html> REPORT: Visitors to Linux World Frankfurt Give KDE A Thumbs Up KDE.NEWS Continuing the successful run of trade show presences, the KDE team used the opportunity of this year's Linux World Expo and Conference in Frankfurt, Germany ... Desktop Linux Consortium Conference debuts - NewsForge Perens predicts desktop surge, promotes user-driven enterprise ... <http://dot.kde.org/1068663688/> BMC execs talk mainframe Linux at zSeries Expo Search390.com, United States Search390.com recently had the chance to discuss the past, present and future of Linux on the mainfame with two BMC Software executives. ... <http://search390.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid10_gci936627,00.html>

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Fsf-friends November 2003