29 Nov
2002
29 Nov
'02
10:29 a.m.
On 28 Nov 2002 00:20:59 +0530, gnu(a)vsnl.net (Ramakrishnan M) wrote:
|| On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:00:51 +0530
|| Mahesh T Pai <paivakil(a)vsnl.net> wrote:
mtp> energon wrote:
Actually, we cannot liken it to any particular licensing scheme
because there is no copyright!
The status of Ayurvedic knowledge can best be described as `in the
public domain'.
--
Khuzaima
> Anybody care to relate GPL software with the
science of Ayurveda ?
> (since Ayurveda is non-proprietory, and doesn't have any side effects
> ;) errm...strings attached :)
mtp> Well, we are on topic actually. Both have much in common. Ayurveda,
mtp> like s/w, is knowledge based. Ayurveda, unlike some s/w licensing
mtp> schemes, keeps the knowledge public. Here, it is like the GNU GPL.
I would say it is more like the BSD license. Anyone can make propreitary
solutions out of it.