found that not all us (including me) understand
the GPL in its
The GNU GPL is really an easy to understand license. Maybe if you pose
an articulated question here, you might get a clued answer from this
due to lack of legal training or pure ignorance
The GNU GPL was `invented' by RMS with no formal legal training. You
too can interpret it very easily. One need not be a lawyer to
understand these things.
I have noticed legal experts struggling to get the concept of free
software correctly. But they are very quick to notice the dangers of
the terminology `open source'.
Please be patient and do read the archives.
Help build a forum to address the GPL issues
Is this not a forum enough?
GNU teaches you sharing