Re: [Fsf-friends] very poor image - Fsf-friends

23 Jun 2004

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:53:59AM +0800, Anwar  wrote:

...
 Also till yesterday the site had a  w3c html mark on it
and the check
had showed it  had 68 errors describing as not  strict, while all the
others  are described as  not transitional,  with the  errors ranging
from 3-30.  I am not not sure  if a page could keep its w3c compliant
logo while having many transitional errors. 
Now  www.gnu.org.in/index.html  is  valid  xhtml  1.0  strict.   refer
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnu.org.in%2F

Regarding the  rest of the pages,  I have created a  template which is
valid html 4.01. 

Once I get the page approved, every thing will be fine. In future also
please  send broken links  and other  corrections (or  suggestions) to
fsf-webmaster (fsf-webmaster(a)gnu.org.in).

Regards
-- 
 .''`.     Dileep M. Kumar &lt;dileep(a)kumarayil.net&gt;
: :'  :    http://www.kumarayil.net
`. `'`     Mobile: 98474-47437
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux - Choice of the Freedom Lovers