On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:53:59AM +0800, Anwar wrote:
Also till yesterday the site had a w3c html mark on it
and the check
had showed it had 68 errors describing as not strict, while all the
others are described as not transitional, with the errors ranging
from 3-30. I am not not sure if a page could keep its w3c compliant
logo while having many transitional errors.
is valid xhtml 1.0 strict. refer
Regarding the rest of the pages, I have created a template which is
valid html 4.01.
Once I get the page approved, every thing will be fine. In future also
please send broken links and other corrections (or suggestions) to
.''`. Dileep M. Kumar <dileep(a)kumarayil.net>
: :' : http://www.kumarayil.net
`. `'` Mobile: 98474-47437
`- Debian GNU/Linux - Choice of the Freedom Lovers