It is actually the brazillian apeal which was not submitted properly.

They had mistakenly said India.  It will be corrected soon.

On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Hari Prasad Nadig <hpnadig@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C400693880C1257459002948D2.html?ref=technology

""The Indian appeal was not lodged in the correct procedure it was not
send to the CEOs of the two organizations but nonetheless it has been
received," Buck said, adding that it will be treated in the same way as
the Brazilian and South African appeals."

On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 19:47 +0530, Anivar Aravind wrote:
> It seems india also appealed ISO process. But I didn't get the
> confirmation yet
>
> see this news
> <http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/146468/india_and_brazil_file_appeals_against_ooxml_standardization.html>
>
> thanks for PJ of Groklaw for pointing this
>
> If anyone have more details please send to me


_______________________________________________
FSUG-Bangalore mailing list
FSUG-Bangalore@mm.gnu.org.in
http://mm.gnu.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fsug-bangalore



--
Chandra Sekar.S

e-mail: chandru.in@gmail.com
Blog: http://tuxychandru.blogspot.com/

We choose the brand of our Mobile Phone, Motorbike, Car, Shirt, Shoe, Bread, etc. Then why not the brand of our OS too?

Pre-loading and forcing Vista on new laptops kills consumers' choice. Fight for choice of OS just as there is for the Hard Disk capacity in new laptops.