29 Oct
2007
29 Oct
'07
9:35 a.m.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:32:29 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar
<siddhesh.poyarekar(a)gmail.com> said:
On 10/29/07, Manoj Srivastava
<srivasta(a)debian.org> wrote:
> In free software, what is in it for the authors? For a large
> segment, getting the credit, and the recognition that follows, is
> _it_. Eben Moglen commented on this to some extent in the recent
> Theo/BSD/LKML scrap about credits for driver code.
Yes, I understand that since I too would be pissed if
someone doesn't
give me credit for my work. But it's very strange that businesses are
willing to give credit to projects like Linux, Eclipse, Firefox, OOo,
etc. but always somehow keep GNU at an arms length.
I guess one of the key factors is that GNU has mostly
contributed to
the base system (shell, tools, compiler, etc.), which can easily go
unnoticed for these business users -- only geeks are in a position to
acknowledge that. Other GNU software like Gnome and various related
software (gtk, Evolution, Gimp, etc) have their unique branding and
hence it doesn't matter whether businesses speak up for them. Even
there though, GNU or FSF don't get so much as a mention.
Eclipse, OOo, Firefox, etc on the other hand have
corporate backing,
so it's natural that businesses take every chance to bask in their
glory.
Is this another argument in favour of Debian GNU/Linux? :)
manoj
--
"The only real way to look younger is not to be born so soon." Charles
Schulz, "Things I've Had to Learn Over and Over and Over"
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(a)acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C