--- JTD <jtd(a)mtnl.net.in> wrote:
<snip>
Publishing a few pics of someone in a public place is
not a
violation.
But publishing a series of photos of someone in various public places
in order to build up a fake story is definetly a violation.
<snip>
Assuming that the act was committed in a public place. Is a pub a
public place? I am asking. I dont know whats the technicality here.
Does "right to admission reserved" make it a private place where right
to privacy takes precedence over right to freedom of expression?
Of course i can't understand
what's so interesting about watching some 2pence celebrity screwing
themselves.
Lets see now,
Cheap Thrills,
Voyeurism,
Cheap Thrills.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com