On Friday 31 December 2010 15:18:59 Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 14:01 +0530, jtd wrote:
> > True. The GPL was designed to ensure wins for both the
> > developer and the end user. The party that loses in this system
> > is the distributor - he now has to play by the rules, or drop
> > out of the system altogether.
GPL-violations.org tracks those
> > distributors who are being difficult about it.
>
> Only violators are losers. Whoever abides by the rules and
> tailors his
> business to the rules wins, including distributors - in a way
> everyone is a minor contibutor to the overall system and everyone
> is a distributor, including distro vendors like canonical,
> slackware, whoever. Whiccever way you look at it, everyone is
> taking orders of magnitude more than they are putting in. The
> best part is this is intended by design.
but I *do* believe that he has drafted the GPL for
the
purpose of protecting the rights of a publisher of source code in
the open. At least I hope so. If one keeps the source code private
(between two individuals), then of what use is GPLing it (apart
from bragging rights - 'I am a foss programmer because my code is
GPLed').
True. Besides the whole point of the gpl is to get others to
contribute. After all there are far more creative guys outside than
inside.
--
Rgds
JTD