20 Sep
2001
20 Sep
'01
4:43 p.m.
Should I do anything special to servers behind a NAT? For example,
connections to $IP on port 81 are redirected to $INTERNAL_IP on 80,
and it gives back data that indicates the real IP instead of 81...
--
Satya. <URL:http://satya.virtualave.net/>
As long as I can remember, I've had amnesia.
20 Sep
20 Sep
9:13 p.m.
--- Satya <satyap(a)satya.virtualave.net> wrote:
Should I do anything special to servers behind a
NAT? For example,
connections to $IP on port 81 are redirected to
$INTERNAL_IP on 80,
and it gives back data that indicates the real IP
instead of 81...
Rewrite the header to reflect $IP::81. You don't want
your NAT'ed systems (which in all probability have
non-routable private addresses) to show up on the
Internet.
Krishnan
__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
21 Sep
21 Sep
6:57 p.m.
On Sep 20, 2001 at 02:59, S. Krishnan wrote:
Rewrite the header to reflect $IP::81. You don't
want
How? ipchains? Could someone give me the rule? There are enough things
wrong with this network that I won't know if the right rule is
inserted.
--
Satya. <URL:http://satya.virtualave.net/>
He's not dead, Jim, he's just metabolically challenged.
11:04 p.m.
U'll have to use ipfwd ipmasq....(this I have read but am not using)
ip chains would allow you to only another port on the same computer.(this I
am using)
rahil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Satya" <satyap(a)satya.virtualave.net>
To: <linuxers(a)mm.ilug-bom.org.in>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:33 PM
Subject: [ILUG-BOM] Servers behind a NAT
Should I do anything special to servers behind a NAT?
For example,
connections to $IP on port 81 are redirected to $INTERNAL_IP on 80,
and it gives back data that indicates the real IP instead of 81...
--
Satya. <URL:http://satya.virtualave.net/>
As long as I can remember, I've had amnesia.
_______________________________________________
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
22 Sep
22 Sep
1:08 a.m.
--- Satya <satyap(a)satya.virtualave.net> wrote:
On Sep 20, 2001 at 02:59, S. Krishnan wrote:
Masquerading. I'll check the right rules up and post
it direct to you on Sunday - right now my boss is
looking over my shoulder!
Rgds,
Krishnan
__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
Rewrite the header to reflect $IP::81. You
don't
want
How? ipchains? Could someone give me the rule? There
are enough things
wrong with this network that I won't know if the
right rule is
inserted.
8113
days inactive
8114
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
rahil -
S. Krishnan -
Satya