30 Jul
2006
30 Jul
'06
9:38 a.m.
I find both YUM and Pirut quite slow as compared to APT and Synaptic.
I don't think this has anything to do with my Internet connection,
since I have used APT (and Synaptic) on the very same machine and
connection as YUM and Pirut. Is this really an issue with YUM?
Regards,
Debarshi
--
,= ,-_-. =.
((_/)o o(\_))
`-'(. .)`-'
\_/
1 Aug
1 Aug
5:19 a.m.
On 7/30/06, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray <debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I find both YUM and Pirut quite slow as compared to
APT and Synaptic.
I don't think this has anything to do with my Internet connection,
since I have used APT (and Synaptic) on the very same machine and
connection as YUM and Pirut. Is this really an issue with YUM?
With Yum IMO. Pirut uses Yum.
--
Rohan
http://rohan.almeida.in
11:07 a.m.
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 05:19, Rohan R. Almeida wrote:
On 7/30/06, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray
<debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thats right. Rohan, yes, yum is pretty slow compared to apt. Why dont
you install apt for fedora?
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
I find both YUM and Pirut quite slow as compared
to APT and
Synaptic. I don't think this has anything to do with my Internet
connection, since I have used APT (and Synaptic) on the very same
machine and connection as YUM and Pirut. Is this really an issue
with YUM?
With Yum IMO. Pirut uses Yum.
3 Aug
3 Aug
6:24 a.m.
On 8/1/06, Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thats right. Rohan, yes, yum is pretty slow compared
to apt. Why dont
you install apt for fedora?
Might. Although I'm quite a RedHat/FC loyalist :-)
--
Rohan
http://rohan.almeida.in
5808
days inactive
5816
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray -
Dinesh Joshi -
Rohan R. Almeida -
Steven Joseph