Hi Ravi and others,
I had requested a statement from our head, Prof. Mihir Arjunwadkar. Below I am pasting the same, and honestly speaking, the statement is a bit too long. Hence, I haven't included it in the document yet. Please have a look and suggest a feedback. After that we could decide whether to ask him to shorten + modify it.
"The Department of Scientific Computing, Modeling & Simulation, Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India, has a long history (more than 20 years) of preferring FOSS over non-FOSS in its academic programmes. We presently offer two academic degree programmes, one in scientific computing, and the other in modeling & simulation. Students from both the programs require substantial interaction with computers and software at an advanced level.
Although markets are filled with non-free softwares targeted specifically at such academic programs, our experience tells us that their use can be avoided. Many high-quality FOSS tools are available, and some of these are, in fact, better than their proprietary counterparts. For example, we have been using Moodle consistently since 2015 to manage courses, conduct exams, and keep track of every single activity related to various courses. All our computer labs and servers run on GNU-Linux based operating systems. We encourage students and faculty to use FOSS tools like python, julia, etc., GNU octave or SciLab instead of MATLAB, Mathics instead of Mathematica, R instead of S-Plus/SAS/minitab/etc., GNU compilers instead of Intel compilers, signal instead of WhatsApp, OpenFOAM instead proprietary CFD tools, etc. This is in addition to departmental services like ticketing system (rt), mail client (RoundCube), git server (gogs), etc.
The ongoing pandemic has seen a big surge for non-free softwares like Zoom and Google meet: We find that freedom-respecting platforms like jitsi meet for video-conferncing, SimpleScreenRecorder and Open Broadcaster Software (OBS) for screen/video recording, etc., work great. Recorded classes are in turn hosted on our Moodle or Nextcloud servers instead of proprietary services like Dropbox, Google drive, etc. This is possible because we maintain our own servers, and decent connectivity/bandwidth is available (through the University) to host these services.
The pandemic also gave us an opportunity to interact with and help sister departments adopt linux, Moodle, and FOSS in general: The assurance of readily available local expertise in FOSS was enough for many to start considering a move to FOSS. Shrinking budgets thanks to the pandemic seem to be providing a financial incentive.
We whole-heartedly encourage and recommend educational institutions, students, teachers, administrators, and decision-makers to start using freedom-respecting FOSS tools. We will be happy to advise (and assist, to whatever extent possible) educational institutions which are considering adoption of FOSS.
(On a factual note, the department does not interfere with the software preferences and decisions related to research funding brought in by individual researchers.)"
Hi Snehal,
Thanks a lot. The statement looks good. I think we can post the statement on a separate page and link our article to that page for details rather than shortening it.
The statement mentions the word 'FOSS' for free software which we do not prefer. He mentions these software as freedom-respecting software and other software as non-free software, and so I think that your department stands for freedom(and not "open-source"). Just note that if you prefer freedom as the statement does, it is important that we use the term 'free software' and not 'FOSS'.
Is it just your department which is dedicated to free software or the whole institute?
What is the motivation behind your department insisting exclusively on free software?
Writing the motivation would be nice.
Thanks a lot!