> 4 I hope the FLOSS cell can give/get some donations of even outdated (by
> a few years) technical books to the schools' FLOSS cell. A library of
> books is very very helpful. Plus they need to have motivational books
> such as Rebel code, Just for fun by linus torvalds, cathedral and the
> bazaar, etc etc just to understand the opensource culture/history.
Hi Githin,
A great place to start up with books would be the offcial GNU
doucumentation which you can get here :
http://www.gnu.org/manual/manual.htmlhttp://www.gnu.org/doc/other-free-books.html
A good edition would also be Free Software Free Society by RMS and Free as
in Freedom by Sam Williams.
These are all available freely online, printed copies for all may not be
very easily obtained in India, but you could start with the ebooks. In fact
you could have a community of like minded people who could pool some money
together and get what you want printed and bound.
What better way to start a FOSS cell :-)
Regards,
- vihan
Hi all,
I recently read "just for fun" by Linus and another writer. Came to know
that he started playing/tinkering with calculators/computers of those
days when he was around 10 or 11. Also he could write system software
(assemblers, device drivers,linkers, loaders, disassemblers, etc) much
before he started the linux project. So he was in a unique position to
actually do this contribution for humanity because he had been honing
his skills for a long time without even planning for it consciously. His
getting hands on the Andrew Tanenbaum OS book (700 plus page book and
studying it extremely thoroughly in 2 or 3 months) also was one of the
points in his history which led him to develop this linux OS. Surely
somebody (some mentor/teacher/classmate etc) would have guided him to
this book or it happenned by chance. It is mentioned that he studied it
so thoroughly that it became second nature to him-- he used to sleep
with it.
Also the student in western system of education decides what they want
to really study whereas we in India are asked to cram any and everything
to give us so called "more rounded" knowledge --ultimately the course is
so vast that we just get superficial knowledge of everything and hardly
learn much. Most private engg colleges have low standards and students
just try to pass by hook or crook. Programming exercises are copied and
there is no system of competitive learning by sharing and open
discussion. I think we should have our elective known to us in 2nd year
and study should be according to that elective. For Torvalds, his
elective subject became system software programming --specially
Operating system development even before he started his course. He
learned other subjects (such as tcp/ip etc etc) related to the main
project with the passing of time from other hackers as well. I think
once he rewrote the kernel as well since something was implemented badly
earlier. (his high standards --make the best software possible)
There is another difference when I compare with Indian
colleges/universities --methods of teaching. Linus had information about
textbooks/recommended reading books much much before his course started
and therefore was able to prepare in advance whereas in our college days
we used to wait for the teacher to tell us which books to buy after the
term started or was half way thru. We used to save on books by borrowing
from the library (generally badly stocked) or get earlier editions /hand
me downs.
The information on how a programmer can do a great job by reading or
learning about the thought processes of such unusual people and geniuses
as the mathematician Gauss etc was also very interesting. (story of
teacher asking a class to calculate the sum of numbers from 1 to 100) It
shows that Linus was already by that time far ahead in his problem
solving skills as he was somehow reading above and beyond his
school/college course --biographies and stories of famed geniuses always
help. His insight into how a question is framed which ultimately leads
to a better solution is also something worth understanding.
His sister Sara actually made him improve his english because of the
sibling rivalry, playful competition, fighting between the children etc
etc and also because he had to understand the manuals etc which were
written in english for all his machines from abroad.
When one compares him with Richard Stallman who also has great
strengths, the only reason one sees him more successful in influencing
something is because he is always in a continuous learning mode (even in
non technical areas as the other writer has written) and also because he
somehow understands the concept of not getting attached to one's
possessions/ideas/beliefs too rigidly because everything is relative.
I hope I can read some book/biography on Stallman too --please let me
know if you know of any.
Thanks,
Kush
R U looking for free earning opportunity ?Work From Home and Earn Thousands.without spending money.
Here it is ! Earn money without investing single naya paisa. Just keep home page link and invite others to do so and you are on a path to earn a big amount. nothing to loose here. just you have to invite others to join this and then u will be credited.
Click the following link to know more.
www.homepagepublicity.com/earn4free.asp?referer=12435
---------------------------------
Find out what India is talking about on - Yahoo! Answers India
Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW
---------------------------------
Find out what India is talking about on - Yahoo! Answers India
Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW
----- kush <corporalster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Have observed that if we have to really reach the top of any
> organisation (research or commercial), our english has to be good
> since
> english is the defacto language of science and technology.
MPO: In community projects this may not be always true.
> Indian techies have weak english specially when we have to compete
> against the best in the world. Even Linus Torvalds was a non native
> english speaker but everybody there speaks/writes good english.
Then why not write in the original language (mother tongue) of the writer and maybe some good translator can do the translation.
> However if people are happy with the chalta hai attitude, then they
> should not complain if they are overlooked within any organisation.
reminds me of the good ol wikipedia, write once and improve forever, why static HTML, someone better in english can improve on it.
--
Sincerely
Ajay Pal Singh Atwal
Dept of CSE & IT
BBSBEC, Fatehgarh Sahib
Punjab, INDIA
--------------------------------
http://www.bbsbec.ac.inhttp://www.ajaypal.com
--------------------------------
ajaypal[at]bbsbec.org,
ajaypal[at]acm.org
Hi all,
Have observed that if we have to really reach the top of any
organisation (research or commercial), our english has to be good since
english is the defacto language of science and technology. But most of
Indian techies have weak english specially when we have to compete
against the best in the world. Even Linus Torvalds was a non native
english speaker but everybody there speaks/writes good english.
The recent post given for some documentation on fonts has a lot of
grammatical mistakes.
http://avi.alkalay.net/linux/docs/font-howto/Font.html
However if people are happy with the chalta hai attitude, then they
should not complain if they are overlooked within any organisation.
Kush