BBC is currently seeking submissions from all you Microsoft Windows,
Mac and [GNU/]Linux devotees "in 100 words or less, why you are such a
supporter of your chosen operating system and what features you love
about it". They will then select one user of each platform to go head
to head in a debate that will be part of the BBC's Microsoft Vista
launch coverage on January 30th.
Read the full story on slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/25/036227.shtml
--
HASTA LA VICTORIA SIEMPRE!
Friends,
Sancharnet, the BSNL mail service provider is undergoing a transition, if its MD is to be believed. The new domain would be bsnl.in, which, is on Microsoft platform. The MD's reason for migration was that this would help supervise and regulate *spams* more effectively! Indian citizens can now imagine a US Cop sitting on top of every mail originating or landing on their private mailbox with censor powers. (Of late mails from our mailing lists are not reaching my mailbox. Perhaps they are spams.)
Another perfect entry to hall of shame...
Details at http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://mail.bsnl.in
Invariably, all e-mail traffic involving the users in subcontinent would be at the mercy of expertise from Microsoft. And all enquiries on such traffic will henceforth be extended only after the consent of US security agencies.
UPA Government seems to be putting the technologists of the entire nation to shame, submitting, so meekly, its political will before a foreign power.
CK Raju
Thrissur
---------------------------------
Heres a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
====Sorry, I didn't get Vimal's earlier posting on the issue. Cheers Vimal. =====
"..2.10 The Government realizes that Free Software presents a truly unique opportunity in building a truly egalitarian knowledge society. The Government will take all efforts to develop Free Software and Free Knowledge and shall encourage and mandate the appropriate use of Free Software in all ICT initiatives..."
Complete IT Draft policy at
http://itforum.kerala.gov.in/discussion/index.htm
-----
By far, the most sensible ever IT policy, one that keeps undesirable tendencies at bay. A policy that systematically removes barriers-to-entry for all, especially the underprivileged for participating in a knowledge society.
Cheers to all our untiring FSF hactivists who worked behind this project.
CK Raju
Thrissur
===========
"..2.10 The Government realizes that Free Software presents a truly unique opportunity in building a truly egalitarian knowledge society. The Government will take all efforts to develop Free Software and Free Knowledge and shall encourage and mandate the appropriate use of Free Software in all ICT initiatives..."
Complete IT Draft policy at
http://itforum.kerala.gov.in/discussion/content.php?topicid=1&subtitleid=7&…
-----
By far, the most sensible ever IT policy, one that keeps undesirable tendencies at bay. A policy that systematically removes barriers-to-entry for all, especially the underprivileged for participating in a knowledge society.
Cheers to all our untiring FSF hactivists who worked behind this project.
CK Raju
Thrissur
> http://blogs.gnome.org/view/ryanl/2006/12/30/0
>
> This article *_indirectly_* speaks about the dominance
> of Non-Free software right from the early years of
> computing, and also recognizes the efforts of FSF to
> make users realize, that Non-Free isn't any good.
> Perhaps, it speaks about being "It works!" / "It
> should work whatsoever" approach.
Interesting view point, and yes it does speak ``about the dominance of
Non-Free software" however its the same stuff about you need it keep
proprietary drivers, firmware etc. in your distro - else it won't work
everywhere and will loose popularity.
i don't think this guy really gets why gnewsense or ututo are being pushed.
You NEED the world to know you need a COMPLETELY Free(as in Freedom)
Operating System(yes that includes a Free BIOS as well). Anything lesser
just won't do, and till the time we do have a completely Free(as in Freedom)
Operating System we have no choice but to use what's there - but that does
not mean we forget the objective of building the system.
The minute you say Ubuntu supports everything(including proprietary drivers)
the user becomes happy - cool - but then what is the probability of him
recognizing the importance of Freedom(if he is unaware of it)?
During our freedom struggle resistance to British economic imperialism by
encouraging swadeshi cloth(mainly khadi), and paper(though very inferior in
quality) was one of the cornerstones of the struggle. People boycotted
british goods - plain and simple, why don't we boycott imperialistic
hardware? Is it so hard(even for a newbie) to purchase hardware after doing
a ``little" bit of homework? Come on, if someone is going to buy a car -
they do ask if you get all the necessary spare parts nearby or where's the
nearest service center.
i think that's what most people forget. Freedom is not restricted to only
those who believe in it or are aware of it, it is for all including those
who don't care about it. They MUST be made aware of it.
And yes, i am very well aware that there are people who couldn't care less
and are irritated when you talk about freedom, well you just have to tell
them what happens when they don't care - if they ignore you - try again, if
they make fun of you try again, if they fight you try harder - then you win.
Its only a matter of time.
Regards,
- vihan
----- Roshan <d_rosh2001(a)yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> http://blogs.gnome.org/view/ryanl/2006/12/30/0
>
> This article *_indirectly_* speaks about the dominance
> of Non-Free software right from the early years of
> computing, and also recognizes the efforts of FSF to
> make users realize, that Non-Free isn't any good.
> Perhaps, it speaks about being "It works!" / "It
> should work whatsoever" approach.
>
> --
> FSF-India Fellow Associate
> http://www.gnu.org.in
>
So whats new is in this new article!
Let me put it this way too, economics dictate the terms, and i can atleast predict the future where creating and maintaining any sufficienty complex proprietary software system is going to be very very expensive in comparison to free(dom) software.
A time will come, when in comparison to past, when we would have used few free software with maybe a completely proprietary operating system, to a completely free(dom) operating software with maybe some marginal, unimportant and optional binary only blobs. And those binary only blobs would be cheaper to maintain for short time periods for the short sighted companies.
And regarding one example of a binary only blob in case of Atheros based wifi card that atheros declined to open up (for madwifi GPLed drivers), now there is a community supported GPLed replacement (though still in beta). Its only a matter of time.
Maybe others in list can site more such examples.
And regarding binary only windoz blobs (lets say device driver in windoz), i have seen/ heard many horror stories where the manufacturer stopped providing driver support for newer versions of windoz, for perfectly working hardware devices, which are now more or less useless in newer versions of windoz. Webcams/ TV tuner cards/ 3d cards/ win modems etc etc..
I too have a 3dfx voodoo card in an old but good faithful machine that may not work in newer version of windowz, the manufacturing company is already dead and I cant see any binary blob to help me out on windoz in case I install anything better than windoz 2000-2(98).
Regarding the above sites blog, i would consider it as a **transition only** phase.
--
Sincerely
Ajay Pal Singh Atwal
Dept of CSE & IT
BBSBEC, Fatehgarh Sahib
Punjab, INDIA
--------------------------------
http://www.bbsbec.ac.inhttp://www.ajaypal.com
--------------------------------
ajaypal[at]bbsbec.org,
ajaypal[at]acm.org
http://blogs.gnome.org/view/ryanl/2006/12/30/0
This article *_indirectly_* speaks about the dominance
of Non-Free software right from the early years of
computing, and also recognizes the efforts of FSF to
make users realize, that Non-Free isn't any good.
Perhaps, it speaks about being "It works!" / "It
should work whatsoever" approach.
--
FSF-India Fellow Associate
http://www.gnu.org.in
__________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/
Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) is a technology that affects all users
of computers, media players, mobile phones and other devices.
"'Your devices don't trust you!' is the basic message of DRM. In fact they
trust you so little that they will not even tell you that they put you under
surveillance," says Joachim Jakobs, FSFE's media coordinator.
[1]<http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q4/000157.html>
"If consumers even know there's a DRM, what it is, and how it works, we've
already failed," says Peter Lee, an executive at Disney.
[2]<http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4342418>
"DRM technologies are based on the principle that a third party has more
influence over your devices than you, and that their interests will override
yours when they come in conflict. That is even true where your interest is
perfectly legitimate and legal, and possibly also for your own data,"
explains Georg Greve, FSFE's president.
[3]<http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q4/000157.html>
Join the campaign to eliminate DRM
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign
Also act against the amendmend to Indian Copyright law for DRM
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign/Proposed-Amenments
Cheers
Praveen
--
"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics', respond those who don't want to learn."
-- Richard Stallman
Me scribbles at http://www.pravi.co.nr