---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Farzaneh Sarafraz <farzaane(a)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 25, 2007 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Asiasource2-participants] Say NO to the Microsoft Office
format as an ISO standard (sign the petition)
To: David Tremblay <david(a)lerap.org>
Cc: Asia Source 2 <asiasource2-participants(a)iosn.net>
I think anybody who has contacts in their local standardization
organization should do something. We have started negotiating about
it, and I am aware of people (specially OO.o people) doing it in their
countries.
On 6/25/07, David Tremblay <david(a)lerap.org> wrote:
> Say NO to the Microsoft Office format as an ISO standard
> * There is already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format
> (ODF): a dual standard adds costs, uncertainty and confusion to
> industry, government and citizens;
> * There is no provable implementation of the OOXML specification:
> Microsoft Office 2007 produces a special version of OOXML, not a
> file format which complies with the OOXML specification;
> * There is missing information from the specification document,
> for example how to do a autoSpaceLikeWord95 or
> useWord97LineBreakRules;
> * More than 10% of the examples mentioned in the proposed standard
> do not validate as XML;
> * There is no guarantee that anybody can write a software that
> fully or partially implements the OOXML specification without
> being liable to patent damages or patent license fees by
> Microsoft;
> * This standard proposal conflicts with other ISO standards, such
> as ISO 8601 (Representation of dates and times), ISO 639 (Codes
> for the Representation of Names and Languages) or ISO/IEC
> 10118-3 (cryptographic hash);
> * There is a bug in the spreadsheet file format which forbids to
> enter any date before the year 1900: such bugs affects the OOXML
> specification as well as software versions such as Microsoft
> Excel 2000, XP, 2003 or 2007.
> * This standard proposal has not been created by bringing together
> the experience and expertise of all interested parties (such as
> the producers, sellers, buyers, users and regulators), but by
> Microsoft alone.
>
> Add your name to the http://www.noooxml.org/petition/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asiasource2-participants mailing list
> Asiasource2-participants(a)iosn.net
> http://lists.iosn.net/mailman/listinfo/asiasource2-participants
>
_______________________________________________
Asiasource2-participants mailing list
Asiasource2-participants(a)iosn.net
http://lists.iosn.net/mailman/listinfo/asiasource2-participants
--
--
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]
http://perfector.wordpress.com/
The Perfect Replacement For MP3
Feedback, bouquets, brickbats to: stanleythomas1(a)gmail.com
Digital music is probably the only kind of music everybody is
listening to these days. The reason being that its smaller in size and
thus makes it easy to share and store. Imagine downloading a 4 minute
track thats approximately 40 Mb in size in a place where access to the
internet is terrible and costs a bomb (thats usually the case in most
places in the world). Thankfully, compression algorithms exists that
can compress the same audio track to one-tenth its size, thus we do
not have to imagine the above.
Few weeks back I downloaded 2 albums, "My Dying Bride - A Line Of
Deathless Kings" and "Slayer - Christ Illusion". The Slayer album was
ripped at a very low bitrate and was not sounding too good. The album
contained 14 tracks and obviously it was ripped at a lower bitrate to
reduce its size. Many thanks to all the people who shared the album
with me, but it was just not to my liking. There was no quality and I
was furious because it took me a long time to download the album as
not many people were sharing it. Boy, what a waste of time and a
killer of expectation. Well thats what made me write this.
Mp3 is an audio compression format that has taken the world by a
storm. Mp3 is almost a synonym for music nowadays as Google is for
search. Now, here comes the problem.. MP3 was good at one point in
time, but not anymore. What's better? OGG VORBIS. AAC, Lame, MP3Pro
neither of 'em match up to Ogg Vorbis' standards. Don't take my word
for it, you can do simple tests to prove it. Take your favorite audio
cd, select a track that you have heard a million times and don't mind
listening to a hundred more and rip it to ogg vorbis as well as to
mp3.
Compare the mp3 and the ogg file to the track on the cd by listening,
well now you know what I'm talking about. The ogg file is a much
faithful reproduction of the cd than the mp3. An ogg file of 80kbps
(bitrate) is equivalent to an mp3 encoded at 128kbps. Hey, there is
still one more issue called "size". Ofcourse here again the ogg file
beats the mp3 hollow. For the same size one can achieve a higher
bitrate with ogg vorbis than with mp3. The best part ogg vorbis by
default encodes in variable bitrate (which deliveres better quality
than constant bitrate).
Isn't this a great piece of information for any music lover? There are
a more advantages in using ogg. Ogg is patent-free. Ok, we are just
not bothered about patents here in India, but in this case we have to
be because a lot of music that we listen to everyday is coming from
outside India. Musicians who sell their songs in mp3 have to pay
royalties. They could just save a bit more of cash by selling all over
the world their songs in ogg vorbis. Not just does it benefit them but
it also benefits listeners and fans. But do you think that they are
seriously bothered? Music is become a business rather than an art
form. Nobody cares about the quality of music their fans are listening
to as long as they are minting big bucks and are being voted for the
Grammy's. Portable players like ipod's also have to pay royalties but
still are unwilling to support patent-free formats like ogg. Why?
Because they too are doing well in selling their products. Neither the
musician nor the manufacturers of players are bothered about the
listener.
As a guy on one of the mailing lists puts it "if only all the music in
china was ripped into ogg vorbis", surely then a lot of players would
be supporting it. There are a few portable players available that
support ogg vorbis. Many of the game developers are using ogg vorbis
and are very happy with the quality of sound and even happier because
they are getting away without paying licenses. e.g. Doom 3.
Ogg is only the container just like avi. It can contain several data
streams at once, like video and the corresponding audio. Vorbis is the
name of an open source audio compression format. There exists Theora
for video compression and Speex for speech. I haven't really tried
these though. If you notice I haven't mentioned anything about Windows
Media Audio (wma) and Real Audio (ra), thats because I find these to
be very cheap proprietary formats. I would never recommend these to
any music lover.
The best part about using ogg is that its open source. A lot of
intense development will continue to take place to ensure that ogg
vorbis remains the best. Its going to be literally impossible for any
other proprietary format to beat ogg in the future. Almost all linux
distributions play ogg out of the box. Things are looking bright for
ogg, especially with all the Dell machines being sold with Ubuntu, we
can expect a lot of vorbis encoded music from the US. Happy listening!
June 25th, 2007
Categories: General . Author: stan . Comments: No Comments
--
FN: Frederick Noronha
Phone 0091-832-2409490
http://wikiwikiweb.de/MyContacts
Every other Linux distribution modifies desktops according to some
usability heuristics. This poll about how users see the end result.
The poll is at http://www.ilug-cal.info/index.php
Best
A. Mani
--
A. Mani
Member, Cal. Math. Soc
dear all,
this is rather impressive!
'moonlight' is a drop-in replacement for silverlight, and runs on linux.
http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight
"Mono is the GPL'd EMCA implementation of the .NET Framework for Linux.
Moonlight is the new Silverlight-compatible runtime for the *nix world."
a blog here mentions the plight of mono's developers.
http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/mono-doesnt-get-enough-credit/
what's missing, the sounds of applause, appreciation, support, and
encouragement for moonlight.
hence 'sannata' a hindi word that means 'soundless' or 'silence'.
:-)
niyam
"Open Source has grown up. Now it is time for us to stand up. I
believe that when we do, the vendors who ignore our norms will
suddenly recognize that they really do need to make a choice: to label
their software correctly and honestly, or to license it with an
OSI-approved license that matches their open source label. And when
they choose the latter, I'll give them a shout out, as history shows.
Please join me, stand up, and make your voice heard--enough is enough."
by Michael Tiemann, President, Open Source Initiative
Read the complete blog post http://opensource.org/node/163
Also on digg http://digg.com/linux_unix/The_Open_Source_Initiative_Finds_Its_Backbone
Cheers
Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now!
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign
Rescue tasks with Grub can be a bit hard at times.
The Super Grub Disk project has been doing well.
http://sgd.howto-linux.de/download/
Recommended for faster rescue operations. .. (especially if you have
to deal with unknown operating systems like M$-Windows and MS-DOG on
systems with the latest Linux systems)
Best
A. Mani
--
A. Mani
Member, Cal. Math. Soc
Hi all,
Red Hat, the largest Linux vendor, and Ubuntu-maker Canonical
have both rejected calls from Microsoft to forge a deal similar to the
one the Redmond giant signed with Linux distributors Novel, Xandros, and
Linspire.
read more..
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Ubuntu-Red-Hat-reject-Microsoft-p…
Regards,
Sreejith
--