"Dileep M. Kumar" wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:38:57AM +0530, V. Sasi Kumar wrote:
Just as a programmer has the freedom to make use of code written by someone, (s)he has the responsibility to give back to the community code that (s)he has written. I think that is the spirit. Do correct me if I am wrong.
A second point is that the strength of Free Software originates from the fact that thousands of programmers see the code and identify bugs in it. Without this facility, there would hardly be any difference between proprietary software and Free Software.
In view of both these aspects, it is essential that GPLd software is made freely available to anyone who wishes to download it.
You are wrong Mr. Sasi Kumar. Even RMS wont agree to your argument. It may be true for a general purpose software like an editor. But programs for specific industry need not be or rather should not be freely (as in free beer) available on net.
This is a wrong argument. Why it should not be available on the net. It is up to the developer to decide depending on what he want. If he thinks that more people seeing the code will help him then he puts it on the net. My personal view is that, if the software is meant for a industry, for example for a bank, they will definitely go for a copy from the original vendor for regular use with some sort of maintenance support. Putting it on the web just help in terms of advertisement. If it a a game for home use, at least our people are not going to spend money on a legal copy. I would say the software meant for etc. should be put on the net so that more people will be aware of it but I donot think any serious bank will just grab a copy and run it.
regards
Ajith