Arun M wrote:
Regarding the C-DIT/Friends issue, its basically not a Free Software vs Proprietary. Its about who is having copyright of the software. The issue wont get solved with the use of Free Software.
I disagree with Arun here.
Free s/w is about *swatantryam* to use, redistribute, change the sources and fine tune the original program to suit one's own needs.
I understand that C-DIT had a contract for development of s/w for the FRIENDS project with one company 'a', and once the C-DIT switched maintenance and future development to company 'b', company 'a' (naturally) got green eyed, and initiated the litigation. If the s/w developed by C-DIT was covered by a standard free license, like the GPL, or at least one of the OSI approved licenses, C-DIT would not have been in the soup it was in.
That apart, if I employ "X" to develop s/w for me, the s/w developed by X belongs to me; not X, *unless* there is a separate agreement to the effect that the s/w will belong to "X". So, I do not get what the C-DIT noise was about.
Even if the work is going to be release as Free Software CDIT/Govt will have to make sure proper agreements regarding the licensing are done.
"Free software" becomes "free software" when it covered by a license which ensures *freedom*. This license *is* an agreement; whether it be the GPL at one end, and BSD at other, and everything in between.
Any way its a very good news that C-DIT is also moving to Free Software.
They are moving towards 'sowjanyam' not 'swatantryam', note the talks about *volunteers*. ( I am subject to correction here ).
Regards, Mahesh T Pai.