-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Anand Babu wrote:
My recommendation is to adopt GNU GPL and find an alternative for the MPL'ed code or write one yourself. You can also ask the MPL'ed code author to dual-license with GNU GPL.
What happen's when the application in question only *installs* binary only packages that are licensed under licenses which are GPL incompatible ?
eg. I create an application/interface that installs two RPMs for two packages A and B. A is GPL compatible if not GPL itself and B is GPL incompatible. How do I license my interface/application or does the license for my application (which in a non strict sense is only an installer) as GPL compatible meet all requirements ?
:Sankarshan
ps: Kushal had called me up last night on this issue and frankly the mix of licenses puzzled me a bit and I suggested that he write in here. If anyone has another person/list he can go to it would surely be appreciated
- --
You see things; and you say 'Why?'; But I dream things that never were; and I say 'Why not?' - George Bernard Shaw