Hi,
There was an interesting interview with Microsoft India Chairman Ravi Venkatesan on software piracy.
The following are some highlights which most of us would not agree, but nevertheless, we can get some insight as to how they perceive this issue.
Here's what he says about the issue.
1. Almost all developing countries tend to be high-piracy markets. 2. Bulk of the economic success in the near future will depend on "Intellectual Property", hence it makes sense for India to have a good regime around "Intellectual Property Rights". 3. Microsoft is trying to "educate" policy makers and governments and helping in setting up IPR courts. 4. If you are using a pirated version, your experience should be perceptibly different and worse. 5. NASSCOM has taken a very strong view on the importance of IPR, genuine software and so forth. 6. Indian businesses today are making record profits, and their refusal to pay for the software they use is a bit unconscionable. 7. If you have got a non-genuine copy of software, it will not be able to access those services. This is a very promising trend for software companies to crack down on piracies. 8. The best Microsoft or any technology company can do is to make it harder and harder, so that the casual pirate is deterred. It will be hard to stop the determined pirate.
It doesn't matter whether we agree with any single point mentioned above, but the lens through which they see the issue of giving freedom to the users is very different from the lens through which our free software world looks at it.
A worrying point in the interview may be how Microsoft is trying to "educate" policy-makers and governments and convince them that sharing is bad.
Thanks and Regards, Viswanath
Hi,
Here's a link to the complete interview.
http://www.hindu.com/2007/08/22/stories/2007082254291100.htm
Thanks and Regards, Viswanath
On 8/22/07, Viswanath Durbha viswanath.durbha@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There was an interesting interview with Microsoft India Chairman Ravi Venkatesan on software piracy.
The following are some highlights which most of us would not agree, but nevertheless, we can get some insight as to how they perceive this issue.
Here's what he says about the issue.
- Almost all developing countries tend to be high-piracy markets.
- Bulk of the economic success in the near future will depend on
"Intellectual Property", hence it makes sense for India to have a good regime around "Intellectual Property Rights". 3. Microsoft is trying to "educate" policy makers and governments and helping in setting up IPR courts. 4. If you are using a pirated version, your experience should be perceptibly different and worse. 5. NASSCOM has taken a very strong view on the importance of IPR, genuine software and so forth. 6. Indian businesses today are making record profits, and their refusal to pay for the software they use is a bit unconscionable. 7. If you have got a non-genuine copy of software, it will not be able to access those services. This is a very promising trend for software companies to crack down on piracies. 8. The best Microsoft or any technology company can do is to make it harder and harder, so that the casual pirate is deterred. It will be hard to stop the determined pirate.
It doesn't matter whether we agree with any single point mentioned above, but the lens through which they see the issue of giving freedom to the users is very different from the lens through which our free software world looks at it.
A worrying point in the interview may be how Microsoft is trying to "educate" policy-makers and governments and convince them that sharing is bad.
Thanks and Regards, Viswanath
"Viswanath Durbha" viswanath.durbha@gmail.com writes:
- Bulk of the economic success in the near future will depend on
"Intellectual Property", hence it makes sense for India to have a good regime around "Intellectual Property Rights".
Very true; not only in the near future, but also in the distant past. Knowledge of the relevant kind does, on several occassions, translate to power. The brahimins knew this well and excluded the other castes from knowledge. The protection of IPR, licensing terms and conditions, etc are nothing but neo-ecno-brahiminism.
And the recent patent contracts with the ilk of Novell, LG, etc nothing but demands from ekalavya for gurudakshina. (well, the simile does not apply here, since free software including linux existed well before M$ and windows, so M$ cannot be the 'guru' of the free software community.
- Microsoft is trying to "educate" policy makers and governments and
helping in setting up IPR courts.
They are also holding training courses for the judiciary. Any idea what is being taught there? I do not have a clue.
Thanks and Regards, Viswanath
By The Way. is this your first post here? Looks like I have missed your earlier posts?