Hi Gurusami,
Thanx once again. If you check RFC 2138 of RADIUS you will find again that it is a bit specific like LDAP.
I will try and explain what i am looking for. I am developing a Distributed Naming Architecture as part of my reasearch work. The Beauty of this Naming architecture is that it will be able to hold information on any kind of entity, still be able to uniquely identify it in the Global Namespace. Now the catch is that this entity need not be related to any specific domain or stream !! I am a bit abstract but i believe it should make some sense.
The implications of such a Naming structure is not difficult to understand !! Naming is the key to Discovery and Discovering is the key to Usage ... Usage is based on Trust .... its all woven toagather.
Regards, tarun
From: Annamalai Gurusami annamalai.gurusami@email.masconit.com Reply-To: annamalai.gurusami@email.masconit.com To: "Tarun Gaur" gaur_tarun@hotmail.com CC: imran@imran.info, fsf-friends@mm.gnu.org.in Subject: Re: [Fsf-friends] Something more Generic and Distributed ... Naming!! Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:51:30 +0530
"Tarun Gaur" gaur_tarun@hotmail.com writes:
Yep LDAP is more specific. Infact I am looking at some ideas related to distributed secure naming architecture that could be applied in and out of virtual world. If anyone knows of any such work somewhere, it will be of great help.
Does Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) protocol of any interest?
Rgds, anna
--
Time-stamp: <2004-04-08 09:56:03 annamalai.gurusami>
Memtest86 is thorough, stand alone memory test for x86 architecture computers. BIOS based memory tests are a quick, cursory check and often miss many of the failures that are detected by Memtest86.
http://www.memtest86.com
_________________________________________________________________ Hotmail on your mobile. Messenger on your mobile. http://www.msn.co.in/mobile/ Stay connected to what matters.
Tarun Gaur wrote:
I will try and explain what i am looking for. I am developing a Distributed Naming Architecture as part of my reasearch work. The Beauty of this Naming architecture is that it will be able to hold information on any kind of entity, still be able to uniquely identify it in the Global Namespace. Now the catch is that this entity need not be related to any specific domain or stream !! I am a bit abstract but i believe it should make some sense.
The implications of such a Naming structure is not difficult to understand !! Naming is the key to Discovery and Discovering is the key to Usage ... Usage is based on Trust .... its all woven toagather.
To quote from the Tarka Samgraha, that classifies categories as [1]substance, [2]quality, [3]action, [4]generality, [5]particularity, [6]inherence, and [7]negation:
[4]Classification of Genarality: Generality is of two kinds: the more comprehensive and the less comprehensive
[5]Particularities: But, particularities abiding in eternal substances are innumerable indeed.
Our ancient epistemology is partly based on `atomistic pluralism' - the core behind [4] and [5] quoted above. Have you ordered English names and words this way - more comprehensive to the less comprehensive? Please do share your work if you have ordered names or words this way.
Regards, Ramanraj.
-
Ramanraj K -
Tarun Gaur