Hi harish,
You are missing the point here again. It is not the words that matter.
I, like you also believe that software has to be free but i strongly contest
the fact that people who do not embrace it dont matter to us. They do matter
and we have to make them understand why FREEDOM, FREE software and FREE GOOD
SOFTWARE (is important). Just because we believe in freedom does not mean
that we do not listen to what they have to say.
Now, Please read my previous note again and tell me where i have said that
end user is unintelligent, does not understand or does not value freedom
....
The very fact that he is intelligent is an indication enough for us to
convince him rather than show "I dont care, they will learn by themselves"
attitude.
We need to educate - rather make them aware; of our philosophy and i am sure
each one of them feels as strongly for Freedom as you and I do.
Sometimes as an analyst you have to keep yourself away from your own beliefs
and philosophies and try and compare and criticize what you think might not
be correct ...
And here what i feel is that we need to value the opinion of " Intelligent
end users" and be our own ciritics at every point as that would help us plug
the holes and evolve.
You took the discussion to "Intellectual Property Rights" and Free Software
and morals and ethics of it. I think we all ... we all understand freedom,
FSF and Free software very well.
As per me the entire IT community put togather is not more than 2% of the
world's population. We need to come out of the technical closet and think
about the rest 98% of the world and how we can make them adopt our
philosophy and software.
And trust me for that, we dont have a choice ... WE HAVE TO BE GOOD and we
are good, then why not be supportive rather than being dismissive to the
"Intelligent End Users".
I can also say ... I like Free Software because .... Reason 1 ...... to
Reason 100. But i dont because i am more concerned and focussed to see that
Free Software Philosophy penetrates to the masses. Once it does, you will
see it everywhere.
I again highlight; whenever we see someone saying that I have a problem with
Free Software ... rather than shooting the guns at him, ask him if we could
help restore his faith and then go and help him. This is in the best
interest of our philosophy, cause philosophies are duds without followers.
Remember, It is not you and me that decides what is good ... it is the
majority and the facts.
We are good, brilliant people ... we write amazing codes ... we just need to
make them a bit more simple. We are doing it slowly but surely.
I am not contesting here on Freedom or good or bad. I am contesting that we
cant ignore 210 million people and more. We need to make them understand,
enlighten them, educate them and we cant do this by shooing them away.
In the proprietry world, companies like IBM, RED HAT and numberless others
used Free Software Fundamentals to manouvere against Microsoft and another
entry is Novell. Now these companies are also people and look at how others
and Red Hat moved to take a big market share, riding on open source. What
are we doing sitting and allowing them to manouvere and criticizing people
cause they say that free software evangelists are deaf if not dumb.
Its a simple thing friends, entertain criticizm, consult, discuss and do
something about it; even if it means contesting RMS opinion. He sure started
it but its freedom what it is all about .. right?
Bottomline, BECOME A MASS MAJORITY RATHER THAN PHILOSOPHICAL MINORITY.
hail FSF,
tarun
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page FREE
download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
Hi Dr. Nagarjuna,
Sorry for being a bit late in replying but let me add to Rishi's compliment
that you write well and are very articulate in expressing your thoughts.
I believe that you agree with me that over all we should attempt to write
"good freedom software".
Now by being focussed on what "good" means here you have asked a very Macro
question because you, me and all our friends know that "GOOD" means
different things to different people. Its an extremely relative term.
Still I will try to answer your question in a very generic way and in total
lay man jargon ...
According to me ...
1. a software is good if it helps me achieve desired set of functional
tasks with minimum focus on technicalities (end user perspective)
2. a software is better if it helps me achieve desired set of functional
tasks with minimum focus on technicalities and is extremely pleasing to work
with through consistent interfaces (end user perspective)
3. a software is best if it helps me achieve desired set of functional tasks
with minimum focus on technicalities, is extremely pleasing to work with
through consistent interfaces, has a definite growth plan, manovers to
incorporate best industry practices and APPEALS TO THE MASSES.
Now ... i redefine the definition of a good software here ... a good
software is that tends towards the best with a plan to be the best. Over and
above that, if it is FREE; masses would embrace it instantly.
Dr. Nagarjun, in that case your, my and FSFs beliefs of FREEDOM SOFTWARE are
realized to its full potential. I stress ... the POTENTIAL exists.
If our software wins, our philosophy wins.
I am not saying that we are not getting there. I stress ... We have taken
giant strides in recent years. But there is a lot to be done. You may show
some features and tell me that the issues i have highlighed in above points
are there to some/great extent in freedom software, still my experience with
end user says otherwise. I repeat ... Good to Great ... cause there is a lot
to be done. On software front as well as promoting the philosophy.
I was sad at seeing the reaction to a small mail from an end user
"Rammanohar Reddy" with some of our friends saying it does not matter to FSF
on what he or any other end user has to say on Free software/Linux. It does
matter ...
Friends philosophies die without mass support and appeal. Though CLASSES are
using the FREE Software, still we are far away from MASSES. Statistics
support what i mean.
Windows XP: 210 Million Copies Sold
http://www.forbes.com/business/businesstech/newswire/2004/05/03/rtr1356086.…
Now my question is ... do these 210 Million people who might have bought
this software dont matter to us? Some would say they dont. I would say they
do.
We could make them switch by helping them.
another question: How many of them have heard about us and our philosophy?
another question: If they have heard, How many would switch? If Yes, why and
if not, why not?
another question: Are they paying for the software because they hate us and
our philosophy?
I will answer this one - they are paying cause they dont have an option.
Give them an option and trust me friends they would switch. If you think you
have already given them an option then explain them your options. "I dont
care attitude" does not help.
210 million people are 209 million too many to ignore. Atleast for me.
Microsofts mention triggers a useless defensive reaction from a lot of our
friends at FSF and elsewhere too. I am yet to understand why? We could take
a leaf out from their research on customers and the expectations.
I repeat FREEDOM matters, does it stop us from evolving and improving. I
have said this before, i will say it again and again and again ...
LETS TURN FROM A PHILOSOPHICAL MINORITY TO A MASS MAJORITY.
There is a lot of work to be done. I am sure Dr. Nagarjuna is doing his
part, Rishi is doing his part and i am doing mine.
Lets write Good FREEDOM software.
P.S. Dr. Nagarjuna and friends i assume we understand what do Masses and
Classes mean.
Hail FSF,
Tarun
==================
IF NOT I, THEN WHO?
IF NOT NOW, THEN WHEN?
==================
_________________________________________________________________
Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN
Premium!
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/mlb&pgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200439ave/dir…
Hi Anurag,
I totally agree with you that free software can be made easy to use. I am
infact not in favor of writing any software that is a nightmare to work
with. That is the reason i initiated this debate by forwarding a mail from
an end user to the list.
Does RMS ever say that Free software should not be designed to be easy to
use? i doubt.
Infact we all know that Freedom matters, Free Free Free ... Lets get over
with the basics and get our heads down to write good FREE software. We have
the Freedom and we promote it too.
.. And the world has heard us loud and clear.
They say the DEVIL LIES IN THE DETAILS ... So its useless to talk about
freedom and free software without backing it up with good software. We have
come this far with good work. Lets just keep on doing the good work and not
pay a deaf ear to end user's perspective.
hail the spirit of FSF
regards,
tarun
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORRY NOT ON WHAT HAS BEEN DONE,
WORRY ON WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
FOR EVOLUTION IS NOT WHAT EXISTS,
IT IS WHAT WE DO WITH WHAT EXISTS.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: fsf-discuss-request(a)mm.gnu.org.in
>Reply-To: fsf-discuss(a)mm.gnu.org.in
>To: fsf-discuss(a)mm.gnu.org.in
>Subject: Fsf-discuss Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1
>Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 12:00:43 +0530
>
>Send Fsf-discuss mailing list submissions to
> fsf-discuss(a)mm.gnu.org.in
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-discuss
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fsf-discuss-request(a)mm.gnu.org.in
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> fsf-discuss-owner(a)mm.gnu.org.in
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Fsf-discuss digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. free good and easy to use software (Mathur,Anurag)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:57:11 +0530
>From: "Mathur,Anurag" <amathur(a)iPolicyNet.COM>
>Subject: [Fsf-discuss] free good and easy to use software
>To: <fsf-discuss(a)mm.gnu.org.in>
>Message-ID:
> <D269C7CBDF116A48982D4DC51F111BE34C22DE(a)nsezhpmail01.india.ipolicynet.com>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi Tarun,
>
>Please refer to ur opening mail.
>I think free software can be made good and easy to use without much effort.
>
>Thanks
>
>Anurag Mathur
>iPolicy Networks
>
>*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>Life is too short to be glum, put a smile on your face and spread it to
>others.
>*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>
>
> I need to create list for both testing/Unstable. Can I use this with
> -d option
Using apt-spy for two different trees would not work out correctly.
Here testing is separate and unstable is a different kind of cake
altogether.
Browse the site http://www.apt-get.org/ and insert appropriate lines in
your /etc/apt/sources.list file instead of using apt-spy ....
--
ragOO Amateur Radio VU2RGU
DRM is clearly an attempt by publishers to unilaterally impose
restrictions that go beyond copyright law. That is, a power grab -- RMS
Hello Friends,
Am using Apt-spy to make my sources.list file.Here
are few things am unable to do nicely*.
1) I need to create list for both testing/Unstable.
Can I use this with -d option.
2) Apt-spy creates list with one or two
sites.Sometimes most packages won't be found on that
site,due to various reason's (don't flame,often I
kindly let the mirror site about this).
It would be great if you can tell me how to have
secondary or bit slower site also listed too.
Can you please share some of the apt-spy tricks so
that I can save my bandwidth.
* I can run apt-spy couple of times and cat the files
ok that's not what am look for here.
TIA
--arky
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
Rakesh 'arky' Ambati said on Thu, May 06, 2004 at 05:31:23AM -0700,:
1) I need to create list for both testing/Unstable.
Can I use this with -d option.
Why don't you experiment? It will not kill you. And you certainly can
educate yourselves.
2) Apt-spy creates list with one or two sites.Sometimes most
packages won't be found on that site,due to various reason's
(don't flame,often I kindly let the mirror site about this).
There is some misunderstanding here. apt-spy looks only for official
Debian mirrors. If you need unofficial packages, like backports, you
need to manually edit sources.list
--
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Mahesh T. Pai, LL.M.,
'NANDINI', S. R. M. Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin-682018,
Kerala, India.
http://paivakil.port5.com
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
On 26th April teachers union from Kerala, KSTA, made a protest
demonstration in front of IT@School project (school IT education program
of Govt of Kerala).
One of the issues raised in this protest was lack of teacher training in
GNU/Linux.
--- Rishi <rishi(a)gangfam.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 02 May 2004 1:58 am, Rakesh 'arky' Ambati
> wrote:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I have a seen a considerable increase in spam
> and
> > auto-remailing virus in my mailbox.Is it possible
> to
> > prevent to mask email addresses on mailing list
> > archives.
>
> Hi
>
> Don't know about masking of e-mail addresses but
> this service called Spam
> Arrest is really great..
>
> http://spamarrest.com
>
> They have a 30 day free trial and I haven't received
> a single spam since.
hi,
Is this GNU/Free software ?
I have addressesed the email to mailing-list admin.
--arky
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover