Sasi Sir,
Reply to the list.
2009/1/3 V. Sasi Kumar <sasi.fsf(a)gmail.com>:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 09:16 +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
>> 2009/1/2 V. Sasi Kumar <sasi.fsf(a)gmail.com>:
>> > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:14 +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
>> >> 2009/1/1 V. Sasi Kumar <sasi.fsf(a)gmail.com>:
>> >> > On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 13:04 +0530, sandeep sr wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The attempts to organize a local FSF chapter in TN without the consent
>> >> >> of the Board Members, the Kochi conference, and the latest reports ...
>> >> >> may be the 'hijack' theory was not entirely baseless.
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't think it is easy to hijack the FS movement. The move to start an
>> >> > FSF chapter in Chennai was probably the act of some misguided supporters
>> >> > of the party.
>> <snip>
>>
>> Read your statement again and see if I am putting statements in your
>> mouth or you have just written what was in your mind.
>> "I don't think it is easy to hijack the FS movement." What does this
>> statement mean Sasi Sir?
>
> I did not know that it meant that I was introducing a hijack theory. I
> thought I was responding to a suggestion that there really was a hijack
> theory. I suppose you did not read the rest of my statement.
>
Not 'introducing' but repeating. Read your previous mails on the same
subject on other threads.