Fsf-friends November 2002

fsf-friends@gnu.org.in

43 participants
108 discussions

by Frederick Noronha

This is what a friend shared with me... Obviously Microsoft believes that they can beat GNU/Linux on the price front. And get youngsters hooked to it at the right age? FN ---------- Forwarded message ---------- We are in the process of Acquiring MSDN Academic Alliance - for Educational institutes only - costs around 799$ / year - gives full access to OS and programs for entire institute -- unlimited number copies - usefull for students as the course curriculum involves MS tools + the industry too at present - job / carrier minded would still persist with MS. We prefered above MSDN AA program as keeping relevant OS+Package upgrades once in 2-3 years would inturn cost much more than keeping the above subscription alive....

20 years, 7 months

NEWS- Stallman: Disk, I/O issues delay GNU OS

by Frederick Noronha

Stallman: Disk, I/O issues delay GNU OS By John Ribeiro November 6, 2002 2:54 pm PT BANGALORE, INDIA -- The release of a production version of the free GNU operating system (OS) has been delayed beyond the end of the year, as the current development version of the system does not support large disk partitions and high speed serial I/O (input-output), according to Richard Stallman, president of the Boston-based Free Software Foundation (FSF). "I would say that when two features that are that essential are still missing, we are not at version 1.0 of the system yet," Stallman told IDG News Service in an interview this week in Bangalore. Stallman was however noncommittal on a new release date. In an interview in March, Stallman said that the production version of the GNU OS was likely to be ready by the end of this year. Developers working on the current development version of the GNU system, also called the GNU/Hurd to distinguish it from GNU/Linux, have found limitations in the Hurd kernel and the GNU Mach microkernel, according to Stallman. "There are two problems that have to be solved," Stallman said. "One of them is the lack of high-speed, serial-line handling, and the other is the limit on the size of a file system which is at somewhere between one to two gigabytes, which means that if you get a moderate size disk you have to divide it into smaller partitions, which is a nuisance." To solve the serial port problem, the GNU project is switching from the GNU Mach to the OSKit Mach, a Mach based on the OSKit for OS development from the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah. "That version of Mach is supposed to get high speed serial line support, although it apparently isn't there in yet," Stallman said. Before the GNU project could switch to the OSKit Mach, it had to rewrite the [Image]terminal support in the Hurd to support virtual consoles. The GNU project has also got developers to work on the problem of the limit on the size of the current Hurd file system. "There are many other things that we want to do that will make the Hurd better, but resolving this issue (of the limit on the size of the file system) is absolutely essential," added Stallman. "I don't think it was realized how bad it is practically speaking not to be able to use whatever your disk partitioning is. Clearly most people are not going to repartition their disks to be able to try out our Hurd based system." Currently some users work with a development version of the GNU/Hurd system distributed by the open source Debian Project. The FSF is also modifying the GNU General Public License (GPL), though the fundamental principles will remain unchanged, according to Stallman. "We have looked at, for example, adding a clause that explicitly states that you give a patent license when you redistribute the software," Stallman added. FSF also plans to incorporate into the GNU GPL a section covering use of software on a computer network. This new section is likely to be on a similar section in the Affero GPL adopted by San Francisco-based Affero Inc. The Affero GPL requires anyone modifying a software program to give immediate access by HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) to the complete source code of the modified software to other users interacting with the software on the network, if the original program had a provision for this kind of access. John Ribeiro is an India-based correspondent for the IDG News Service, an InfoWorld affiliate. http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/11/06/021106hngnudelay.xml?s=IDG NS ENDS

20 years, 7 months

Low-cost Brazilian PC...

by Frederick Noronha

Thanks to Jeebesh Bagchi <jeebesh(a)sarai.net> for sending it across... Is this some coincidence that all the low-cost PCs -- aimed at widening access to those who can't afford -- are almost all GNU/Linux-based FN Curing Poverty with Computing Brazilian University Researchers Build Cheap Computers for the Masses Ben Goertzel http://www.goertzel.org/benzine/BrazilianComputers.htm here is an excerpt "The idea here was to create a computer that members of the Brazilian underclass could genuinely afford.� The Net PC will cost around $400 reiais (around US$ 200), and will be available by June 2001.�� Furthermore, in order to ensure affordability,� and a 24-month payment plan will be offered. �The task of creating this machine was turned over to the computer science department at one of Brazil?s leading universities, the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), in Belo Horizonte.� The project was led by a number of expert computing researchers, including Sergio Vale Aguilar Campos, trained at Carnegie-Mellon University in the USA, and Wagner Meira, trained at the University of Rochester in the USA.�These professors are accustomed to spending their time doing research and teaching on advanced topics like parallel computing (running programs on specialized computers) and automatic program verification (programs that check to be sure other programs are doing what they?re supposed to).� But they and many of their colleagues and students were willing to take time out from this to work on the government-sponsored project of bringing much simpler aspects of computing to a much wider population. The Net PC itself will be a fairly standard one . a Pentium 500 MHz, with keyboard, mouse, 56 Kbps modem, 14" display, 64 Mb RAM and no hard disk (16 Mb flash RAM instead).� According to those involved in the project, the technical aspects of designing the system were not particularly onerous ? no major inventions or innovations were required.� The hardest part was bargaining with the manufacturers of the various parts of the machine, who tended to be oriented toward making the most expensive and powerful machines possible rather than creating low-cost systems.� Early on in the project it was realized that the Microsoft Windows OS was not an option, due to its high cost.� Instead, the system was built around the freeware Linux OS, the favorite of hackers everywhere.� This is a very interesting aspect of the project.� In the US and Western Europe, Linux is a minority OS, used by hackers, programmers and computer scientists only.� Standard tools like browsers and word processors exist for Linux, but aren?t quite as polished or user-friendly as on the Windows OS.� On the other hand, advanced tasks are much easier to carry out in Linux than in Windows, and there are other major advantages, such as Linux?s increased stability (machines running Linux can go for years without ?crashing?, whereas the typical time between crashes for Windows systems is more like days).�� And Linux, unlike Windows, is an open-source software system, meaning that anyone around the world can edit the computer code that determines how the system runs, and make it run differently.� By its very nature, it invites participation from users, whether those users are in the Brazilian ghetto or in the heart of Silicon Valley.� In the same spirit as the choice of the open-source Linux architecture, the UFMG computer scientists decided to make the�main-board architecture for the machine open as well, meaning that any company will be able to make it, and that computer-savvy users will easily be able to modify it or add onto it as they wish. � In fact, this is just one example of the international move toward open-source software, which does not yet pose a huge short-term threat to Microsoft?s hegemony in the OS market, but may well do so in a few years time.� For instance, the government of Argentina is considering passing a new law mandating that, after an adjustment period government offices can only use Open Source software.� And, less extremely, the French government currently dictates that no computer files can be used in government business unless they can be read and edited by Open Source software.� � Each successive version of Windows software uses more and more computational resources, thus providing more functions (sometimes useful ones, sometimes useless one) and pushing consumers to buy more and more powerful computers each year.� As Wagner Meira says, in this regard the Net PC project was strikingly contrarian.�?We did a lot of hacking for shrinking a lot of software into 16Mb.� There was a lot of discussion around our minimalist approach versus the maximalist approach usually adopted by Windows. We are watching an ever growing and ever more flawed Windows over the years, and our project adopted exactly the reverse direction.?� � Instead of asking what can be done to sell more software or more hardware to middle-class North Americans (the question on the minds of most people in the US computer industry), they asked, as Meira puts it:� ?What does a computing novice really need in a computer? Internet (including multimedia) and text processing.� Eventually software for creating a spreadsheet or a presentation.�However,? ? and here is the big difference from projects like the American WebTV -- ?the Net PC does allow expansions for those that want to have an enhanced computing experience.? WebTV and similar projects allow very limited Internet use at low cost, but they don?t allow the user to grow in sophistication.� With the Net PC, on the other hand, Meira says, ?by employing an incremental approach, we believe that we can reach a much larger portion of the population without restricting the use of the equipment.�My mother, for instance, had a hard time to learn how to double click, and she definitely does not know how to shut down the computer.?� Yet a young Brazilian who wants to learn to program software can do so on the Net PC; indeed its Linux kernel provides in a some ways a better platform for this than a standard Windows-based computer. � Finally, Meira observes cannily that the minimalist approach taken in the Net PC is the sort of thing that could only emerge in a place like Brazil, not in a place like the USA, where ?More, more, more!? is the watchword.�?In Brazil,? he notes, ?popular stuff is usually minimalist, such as� the popular car (up to 1000cc), pre-paid cell phones, etc.?�� This is a small example of the general principle that the developing world must lead its own people into the information age.�The cultural and conceptual biases of First World countries aren?t necessarily in synch with the needs of the rest of the world, even though First World technology has universal applicability. � What impact will these cheap, open-architecture computers have on the Brazilian underclass, on the tremendous economic inequity that is the underbelly of this rapidly growing digital economy?� This remains to be seen.� One hopes that they will serve to blur the distinction between the lower reaches of the middle class and the upper echelons of the poor.� That families will save their money to buy cheap computers for their children, who will then go online and learn about the depth of� world far beyond their neighborhood, opening their eyes to the possibilities that aren?t shown in TV sitcoms and reality shows.�� How many people, whose parents weren?t university-educated, will use their new Net PC?s as tools to help them gain computer skills, so that they can get in on the ground floor of one of the software start-ups in Brazil?s booming software industry?� � Of course, cheap computers aren?t the whole solution to Brazil?s problems ? they?re only one very small piece of a huge and complicated picture.�Overall improvement of primary education in poor neighborhoods is a huge task which is inarguably both more critical and more difficult.� But it?s important not to be overwhelmed by the magnitude of the human problems around us, and to realize that every little bit counts.� The popular bumpersticker says ?Think globally, act locally,? and this is one of those clich�?s that actually deserves the repetition it receives.�The computer scientists at UFMG, as they take a break from their advanced research on parallel algorithms and program verification to create inexpensive computers for the masses, are playing an integral role in the technological advancement of human race and the overall creation of global computational intelligence.� We need the next phase of the tech revolution to be founded on compassion and inclusion, not elitism, classism and egocentrism.� This is a responsibility that falls on us all. ��PostScript: Class Politics and the Cyber-visionary Community � What do the leaders of the tech revolution in the developed world think of this kind of work?� Precious few cyber-leaders are in practice interested in devoting their time to such pursuits.�� One hopes that as more and more technology millionaires reach the age where they become interested in philanthropy, the spread of the tech revolution across the world will become a focus, along with other laudable goals like global health and education.� But at the present time, opinions on the importance of reaching out to the masses, and the optimal strategy for doing so, are all over the map. � A few months ago, excited about the Brazilian Net PC and the prospect of further similar projects around the world, hopefully coupled with serious educational initiatives, I began talking about such things on the Extropians e-mail list, an Internet discussion group devoted to futuristic technology and its social and economic implications.� Someone noted that the views of the Extropian community tended not to be taken very seriously in the mainstream press, and I suggested that, perhaps, if the Extropian community became involved in doing something important to the mainstream world, their opinions would be valued more.� What if, for instance, a group of Extropians devoted some of their time to education in the Third World? � Eliezer Yudkowsky, a friend and colleague whose opinion I respect, came down against this hard.�� According to him, his time and effort, and that that of his cyber-guru colleagues, should be spent pushing full-speed-ahead toward the ?Singularity?, his word for the point at which the acceleration of technical development becomes infinite, through computer programs rewriting their own source code, robots rebuilding their own hardware and other similar futuristic designs.�?How much money is spent on attempts to actually ship food directly to the poor?? he asked. ?Lots.� How much money is spent on direct efforts to implement the Singularity? ? Not much.? � On the other hand, Samantha Atkins, another Extropians list regular and a veteran Silicon Valley AI engineer, replied to Eliezer with a different point of view: ?Perhaps,? she suggested, ?there is a productive middle ground.� Some of us could say more about precisely how the Singularity, and the technologies along the way, can be applied to solving many of the problems that beset real people right now.�We can produce and spread the memes of technology generally and AI, nanotechnology and the Singularity in particular as answering the deepest needs, hopes and dreams of human beings?.�As part of this we also need more of a story about the steps up to Singularity as involves the actual lives and living conditions of people.� That we will muddle along somehow while a few of the best and the brightest create a miracle is not very satisfying.� What kind of world do we work toward in the meantime?� What do we do about poverty, about technology obsoleting skills faster than new ones can be acquired, about creating workable visions including ethics and so on?� What is our attitude toward humanity?? � What is our attitude toward humanity, indeed?� Eliezer is a very ethically serious person, and he truly believes that the best thing we in the cyber-elite can do is for the world is to produce superior technology.� The technology itself, he says, will transform the world for everyone, and the most important thing to do is to get the technology to this point, to the point where it can figure out how to solve the world?s problems on its own.� � There is a certain amount of truth to this perspective.� And, in my view, there is also a certain irony to it, particularly given the fact that Eliezer?s research so far has focused on how to make AI programs ?Friendly,? in the sense of being well-disposed toward humans.�� His solution to the problem of AI friendliness lies in the realm of cognitive engineering ? he believes one needs to give an AI an appropriate goal system specifically designed to foster Friendliness. � In early 2001, I was running the AI company Webmind Inc., and Eliezer visited our New York office to give a lecture on Friendly AI.� The lecture was received excellently by some and terribly by others.� Generally speaking the Webmind Inc. staff were absorbed with the practical problems of trying to create real digital intelligence, whereas Eliezer was more concerned with the various philosophical and futuristic issues that will arise once a truly intelligent AI system is completed.� But the issue of ?wiring in Friendliness? definitely struck everyone powerfully, one way or another.� Among the milder responses, one of our Brazilian software engineers ? not one of the several who had worked on the Net PC project before joining Webmind, but a good friend of those who had, and a student of Wagner Meira and Sergio Campos ? raised his hand and politely said: ?But perhaps the most important thing is not the in-built goal system, but whether we teach it by example.?�� The friendlier we are, in other words, the friendlier our AI systems are going to be.� � The issue is clear and poignant.� What the Brazilian engineer was suggesting was that, if our superhuman AI grows up watching us act as though most humans are dispensable and irrelevant, perhaps it will, in its adulthood, believe that we too are dispensable and irrelevant.� On the other hand, perhaps, as Eliezer says, it will grow up and understand that building it was the best thing the cyber-elite could do for humanity as a whole, and it will then proceed to spread joy and plenty throughout the land.��Who knows? These rarefied ethical disputes are fascinating, but they easily carry one away into the domain of angels dancing on the heads of pins. �And this is why the kind of work done by Campos, Meira and their colleagues is so intriguing.� There?s no arguing with the real physical-world power of millions of impoverished Brazilians logging onto the Net and discovering discussion groups like Extropians, where things like ethics and technology are discussed, and speculations on superhuman AI appears alongside critiques of the latest Java release.� Without the Net PC and other things like it, these people might well never get to log on and argue with Eliezer for themselves.� (Not, at any rate, unless the Singularity comes fast enough that superhuman AI systems revolutionize their lives before they get old.) �In spite of the success of Cardoso?s economic reforms, there is a lot of justified skepticism in Brazil about the whole political system and everything the government does.� University people are up in arms over Cardoso?s plan to charge significant university tuition, breaking a tradition of free university education for all sufficiently academically distinguished students.� As Thiago Turchetti Maia, another Brazilian software engineer and student of Meira and Campos, says, ?You know the money saved from charging tuition is not going to go to send poor people to university.� You know it?s just going to disappear.?� But when asked about the Net PC project, he waxes at least a bit more positive.. ?Well, there, you can see what the money?s going towards,? he says.� ?At least that?s something real.?� He shrugs.� ?Maybe it will make some difference?.? " Or is this hype ? � -------------------------------------------------------

20 years, 7 months

Fwd: [fsug-calicut] Some thing to reply..

by baiju

Forwarding from FSUG-Kozhikode list. --- Baiju M ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [fsug-calicut] Some thing to reply.. Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 11:03:53 +0530 From: "Jaisen.N.D." <jaisu_vyas(a)rediffmail.com> To: fsug-calicut(a)freelists.org Hai, Have any one seen the month's Sasthragathi? Not yet? Then please get it.. It have an article by K.Anvar Sadath and T.P.Sudhakaran, working in Information Kerala Mission. They tries to justify the Microsoft - based foundation of the project. They point out: - Software development is not a mental effort of only the programmers involved, but, it is a user - based effort in a human centered thought. So, the training of users, and the efforts which enable the users to use the technology have more importance. > I agree with it. Me too was a volenteer in IKM's OIK project (to computerise the panchayat election counting centers in 2000.) which was a big flop. - It is a business strategy to raise a particular technology as a solution for all type of issues. > They says that, the fsf movement and all the efforts of volenteers all over the world are simply a business trick. Should I say something? - Application of technology has many expenses.. They include - direct expenses - non-direct expenses - invisible expenses - short term expenses - long term expenses etc. so a technology should be chosen considering all these things equally. > Me too agree. Is the GNU more expensive than MS based things considering all these? Sounds interesting.. - To surrender to the greatness of a particular type of technology, and tolerate with it's dominance is not scientific. > Here goes all the waters out.. Who are surrendering? - Unix is not developed for ordinary users. So the Unix is unreachable for ordinary users and it is the main drawback of Unix....... All the capabilities and drawbacks are common for all the OSs like Linux which are included in Unix family..... Unix and Linux are for the expert users who are working in powerful computers.. > It is true that Unix was not developed for common users. But the train is running.. There was a time, which there were no GUIs for Unix and it's clones. But now situation is different. Almost all the distributions of Linux comes with a very user-friendly GUI which are equally or more better than any other available in the market. - Total Cost Ownership ( TCO ) includes the expenses of administration, training, technical assistance, other services as well as cost of software...... Open Source code doesn't win the market because, it feels costly in the observations based on TCO. > Is it? Where is the Survey / Study reports? - Windows has a simple and easy GUI.. > Linux has more than one simple and easy Desktop environments.. - Technical assistance for Linux is limited. Big Projects can't go depending on volenteering help services. > Then how the govt. projects of many countries of the world like China or Brazil goes? - Open Source is only a business trick to get dominance in the market using some values.. - RMS is neither tries to connect the bad effects of patents and copyrights with capitalistic authority and it's values ... - Inside the framework of Capitalism, no any future for humanity, equality, or honesty in long-terms through FSF. - C-Dit gets Microsoft products in discount rates.. after the agreement with them. - The agreement is not a new thing. National Informatic Centre and many State Govt agencies have experience in these type of agreements. > I know that The Mail server of NIC for the students and teachers (http://edumail.nic.in) Runs on Microsoft's Outlook Express. But is it a model to imitate? ............... and a lot. What u think? Can't we reply? -jaisen. --------------------------------------------- FSUG-Kozhikode Home Page : http://www.freelists.org/webpage/fsug-calicut --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------

20 years, 7 months

Graphics designer... interested in creating fonts

by Frederick Noronha

Please get in touch with Michael Steidley directly.Thanks, FN Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 08:21:47 -0500 Subject: GPL Fonts From: Michael Steidley <michael(a)ariesgraphics.net> Hello! I recently read your article in Linux Journal about Indian language solutions in linux. I'm a graphics designer and digital media specialist. I've been creating fonts for over ten years and I'm interested in helping create fonts for Indian languages which do not have any GPL fonts available. If you could put me in contact with someone concerning this matter I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you for your time. --Michael Steidley

20 years, 7 months

Halloween7 document

by Raju Mathur

Hope I'm not repeating, but I don't recollect seeing this on the lists earlier. For the purists, while the memo uses the term open source extensively, it can be replaced by free software over most of the document. 'Ware when replying and cross-posting. http://opensource.org/halloween/halloween7.php Executive Summary This mail provides a detailed summary of the results of the Attitudes Towards Shared Source & Open Source Research Project managed by Kathryn Marsman and directed by David Kaefer and Jason Matusow. The Shared Source project was developed to provide a greater understanding of how key audiences perceive Open Source, Linux, Shared Source, and the GPL and which messages will be effective with each audience. The survey was fielded in the U.S., Brazil, France, Germany, Sweden, & Japan with developers, IT and non-IT BDMs, IT Pros and Issue Elites. Please note that save for the U.S., the individual country and audience sample sizes are extremely small. The survey questionnaire and samples were developed collaboratively by Redmond, the subsidiaries and the survey vendor. All data collection utilized a telephone-based interviewing process. The study fielded between late-July and September 2001. The detailed summary below drills into OSS and Linux familiarity and favorability, those reasons people give for being supportive of OSS and Linux, Shared Source familiarity and favorability, and OSS, Linux and Shared Source messaging. Key takeaways follow. [snip] -- Raju -- Raju Mathur raju(a)kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/ It is the mind that moves

20 years, 7 months

Richard Stallman in Delhi

by Frederick Noronha

------------------ History Society, Ramjas College + Sarai/ CSDS invite you to a talk " Copyright vs Community in the Age of Computer Networks" by RICHARD STALLMAN, Founder, Free Software Foundation on Friday, November 8, 2002 The talk will be followed by a discussion. Venue: Auditorium, Ramjas College Time: 11.30 AM "COPYRIGHT developed in the age of the printing press, and was designed to fit with the system of centralized copying imposed by the printing press. � But the copyright system does not fit well with computer networks, and only draconian punishments can enforce it. The global corporations that profit from copyright are lobbying for draconian punishments, and to increase their copyright powers, while suppressing public access to technology. �But if we seriously hope to serve the only legitimate purpose of copyright--to promote progress, for the benefit of the public--then what must be done is either to reduce copyright powers or effectively eliminate them, depending on the kind of work. �Governments must now protect the public's right to copy." RICHARD STALLMAN is "the founder of the GNU Project, launched in 1984 to develop the free operating system GNU (an acronym for "GNU's Not Unix''), and thereby give computer users the freedom that most of them have lost. GNU is free software: everyone is free to copy it and redistribute it, as well as to make changes either large or small." Stallman has also founded the related Free Software Foundation (FSF) and is outspoken about his belief that all software should be free. In his view � proprietary software, for which corporations charge a fee, is wrong from a moral or ethical standpoint. -------------------------------------------------------

20 years, 7 months

[Fwd: [LIG] Some assistance needed in Aramboly, Tamil Nadu]

by Sayamindu Dasgupta

-----Forwarded Message----- > From: Thommie Rother <t.rother(a)netzwissen.de> > To: linux-india Mailing Liste <linux-india-general(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [LIG] Some assistance needed in Aramboly, Tamil Nadu > Date: 06 Nov 2002 13:10:57 +0100 > > Hi folks, > this message does't come from a Linuxer in India, but in Germany: > I am working with an NGO supporting a home for orphaned children in > Tamil Nadu, the Annai Seva Ashram. The home is located in Aramboly, > Kanyakumari Dist., a few kilometers from Nagercoil. The children are > from 7 to 15 yrs old, they get basic education in local public schools. > Our NGO here in Germany supports the projects since 18 years. For > details, see http://www.annai.de (sorry for the english pages not being > "up to date"). > > I have two questions: > > 1) On-site Linux/graphics/printing advice in Kanyakumari district > To make some (additional) money, the home had operated a little print > shop for some years. As the classic "mechanical printing" is out of date > now, the machinery has been sold. Instead of this, they want to invest > into computerized printing. They will not buy a complete "printer > factory" , but rather specialize in pre-press/pre-printing activities. > That means, they want to create the digital data, the actual printing is > done elsewhere. All necessary knowledge on printing is already there. > Our board has opened a budget for the purchase of a good (professional) > desktop PC and the chief officer of ASA (Mr Sukumaran) had already > received an offer from a computer shop in Nagercoil plus some detailed > recommendations from us, concerning the hardware. > > For the software side, we recommend strongly to NOT invest into > proprietary M$ Windows stuff but rather into the Linux OS and > free/Open-Source software. But the final decision is up to them! I am > looking for some person who is willing to give Mr Sukumaram some on-site > advice, in the case that he will decide to use Linux and Linux graphical > programs (that will be GIMP, I assume..). I already made some searches > on linux-india.org, but without successs concerning the Kanyakumari region. > > 2) Website creation in the tamil language > For the www.annai.de site, we want to have a three-language setup: > primarily in german, then tamil and english. I am looking for some > practical start-up hints on creating tamil web pages. Can anyone here > give me an overwiev on this? I have people who can translate from > english to Tamil (at ASA), but how is tamil supported in current > browsers/OS'es nowadays? > > Greetings & thanks for your help! > Thomas > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > THOMAS M. ROTHER * n e t z w i s s e n * D-73728 Esslingen > F.R. Germany, European Union * mailto:t.rother@netzwissen.de > http://www.netzwissen.de * GPG Key from http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net > Fingerprint B208 E204 4249 4635 19B9 B691 3E73 C8B9 1229 DE4C > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > _______________________________________________ > Linux-india-general mailing list > Linux-india-general(a)lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-general

20 years, 7 months

Just who is Richard M Stallman (a pen-potrait) / Long

by Frederick Noronha

* * * Please excuse this long post... today is an unusual day in the history of GNU/Linux in Goa. RMS speaks at the GEC at 4 pm on November 6, 2002 (This article was written c. 2001) * * * OpenNews: OpenSource newz from India! ... Free(tm) news for a free future!

20 years, 7 months

Chronology of Open Source / Free Software

by CK Raju

An interesting link of chronology. http://www.grulic.org.ar/proposicion/doc/noticias-web.html That's a fantastic work. CK Raju

20 years, 7 months

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Fsf-friends November 2002