http://danny.oz.au/free-software/advocacy/appropriate.html
[1]Danny Yee >> [2]Free Software Advocacy
Free Software as Appropriate Technology
Imagine you are putting water pumps into a village in Africa. You have
a choice between two products:
Product A vs Product B
_________________________________________________________________
Designed by a worldwide community development process open to anyone.
Sold and supported by thousands of companies, large and small. [vs]
Produced and sold by a single vendor, a large multinational with a
long history of unethical business practices. Control maintained by
aggressive use of intellectual property law.
_________________________________________________________________
Comes with complete schematics and a set of tools for making custom
modifications. If you can't do this yourself, there are hundreds of
different organisations and companies worldwide who offer
customisation as a service. [vs] Is a sealed unit. Not only is access
to its internal workings difficult, but international and national
laws have been used to make it illegal to even look inside the casing,
let alone modify the contents.
_________________________________________________________________
Uses standard pipe fittings; designed to connect with equipment from
all suppliers. [vs] Uses proprietary and poorly documented pipe
fittings - often deliberately designed to prevent connection with
equipment from other suppliers.
_________________________________________________________________
There are no additional licensing costs on top of the cost of the
equipment. [vs] As well as buying the product itself, you have to
licence the right to use it. The licence fee increases with the amount
of water you pump.
_________________________________________________________________
A growing number of add-ons are available. [vs] A wider range of
add-ons are available.
_________________________________________________________________
Has maybe 1% of the consumer mass-market, but is used by perhaps 30%
of specialists in the field. [vs] Has more than 90% of the consumer
mass-market.
_________________________________________________________________
Has a highly configurable control system. [vs] Has a simple standard
set of controls which are easier to learn.
_________________________________________________________________
Is highly resource-efficient; works with older power sources. [vs]
Requires a large, modern power source.
_________________________________________________________________
Often runs for years without any problems. [vs] Is notoriously prone
to malfunction.
It is clear that Product A has to be the choice in this situation,
under any criteria for appropriate technology (or ethical purchasing).
But this is an analogy - the actual comparison is, of course, between
GNU/Linux and Microsoft Windows.
Hello Friends,
I was thinking about reprinting GFDL'd books like the ``Emacs Manual''
by RMS, ``Free as in Freedom'' by Sam Williams etc. in India. Could we
at FSF-India do something about it? We can arrange for discounted
paper, etc. from some Govt./Private organisations etc. for that. I think
that'd be of great help to us users and also those who want to learn
[GNU]Linux especially since there are no [or very less for that matter] good
and cheap books available in India. What do you think ?
Bhaskar Ghose
---------------------------------
Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. No[or GNU/Linux] is the answer.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
dear all,
Demo@Schools, Chennai is glad to announce the release of its first
book, a GNU/Linux TCP/IP networking tutorial written by
Mr.M.K.Saravanan. The book is released under the GNU Free
Documentation License.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/demo-schools/gnu-linux-nw-tutorial-0.3.…
coming soon... more books from Demo@Schools... :)
-Suraj
--
+--------------------------------------------<suraj(a)symonds.net>---+
| When my beloved was bound in affection, I had no occasion |
| to know that the eve could be paining in separation |
| (distress of the evening - 6), Thirukkural |
+---<http://symonds.net/~suraj/>-----------------------------------+
Sorry for that error, the number is 0494 2680977
On Friday 14 March 2003 05:32 pm, M.Balakrishna Pillai wrote:
> CK Raju wrote:
> >The teacher is PP Ramachandran 0494 2680997.
> >CK Raju
>
> Dear Mr Raju,
> I seems the number is worng. Error may be in the STD CODE.
> Kindly advise the correct one.
>
> M.Balakrishna Pillai
Suraj Kumar
> We definitely have to act against this. What are we going to do?
Instead of crying soar on this list, we can write articles/letters to
various newspapers. The articles will have to be backed up with
considerable proof/charts & tables that will be hard to ignore.
And we will have to get them into mainstream press. Can you imagine a
Director in some ministry reading Slashdot or newsforge. The points that
we can point out in favor of Free Software
- We are free to make changes and hence customize it to our needs. We
can also audit the software for security flaws and errors.
- Less cost
- Generates employment (as the software needs maintainance, training and
modifaction)
- the money of the state/country remains inside the countryy and does
not go to foriegen countries
I would also like to respond to a quote from CkRaju (in a different
post). He said that
`
Someone advised me the other day, that spending time in learning to live
with such a condition, would be a much better option, than attempting to
challenge or change the views of the 'bureaucracy'.
'
Imagine if RMS had said that. Sometimes it just takes one man to make a
stand.
--
Raj Shekhar
http://geocities.com/lunatech/
hi members of the list,
of late there has been a thread that started off with discussion(s) on the
semantic correctness of *intellectual capital* and then veered towards the role
to be played by FSF especially FSF-India. Arkoprovo, Nagarjuna G and a few
others have already laid down some ideas. i feel that i too should have my say.
Over the past 18 months, some hectic development and r&d activity on the
GNU/Linux front has ensured that the media glare is fully on this movement. day
after day we are bombarded with media stories on this issue. as a subscriber to
various GNU/Linux related mailing lists, a pattern seems to be emerging, in as
much as my limited understanding of it goes. the (G)LUGs across the country are
more into the implementation and execution aspect of the movement. while this is
good and desired, what however is not so desirable is that the conceptual aspect
of the movement is getting diluted. as all (G)LUG coordinators will admit, most
of the new members (i mean the newbies and not the old hands who are
subscribing) are keen on getting onto the bandwagon enticed by the technical
aspect/side of the GNU/linux implementations. meeting themes at these (G)LUGs
generally do not touch upon the theosophy (if it can be termed as such) of the
movement.
it is my firmly held belief that besides the obvious merit of the movement over
proprietary or non-free software, the beauty lies in the philosophy it espouses.
the idea of a common shared pool of knowledge from which societal benefit could
occur. one of the major characteristics of the post 17th century societies has
been the unbridled enthusiasm for science as a vehicle for enabling common good.
ICT must be seen as an enabler and as a driving force. currently we are faced
with a crisis of shrinking spaces to voice our thoughts and our ideas. our fears
and our hopes. technology, which was supposed to provide such fora has been
subverted (sometimes brazenly) so as to curb such sharing of knowledge. In such
a scenario, i think that FSF has a larger role to play.
(G)LUGs being inward looking in a technological sort of way, the onus is upon
FSUGs to form and spearhead the philosophical bulwark of the movement. FSUGs
should, i believe, work in tandem with (G)LUGs to propagate, promote, nurture
and further the reach of the Free Software Movement. i have often heard that
such synergy and symbiotic relationship is untenable "that is against the basic
tenets of both groups" - but is it ? willing or unwilling to name the OS as
GNU/linux has long been the subject of mighty flames on different lists, but in
the end it does boil down to personal choice. the freedom to choose is one of
the most abused and most revoked freedoms in these times. in the mails between
Raj Mathur (RM) and RMS, the latter stated beautifully - 'what you want the OS
to be called is your choice and your liking, but you'd be doing us wrong if you
do not give us credit' [or words to that effect, my mail archive is backed up
and so i have to rely on memory]. that is what FSUGs must build on. an active
and sustained campaign to create an upswing of public awareness. hold meetings
and seminars relevant to the locus of the FSF idea and revolving around the
central theme of FSF philosophy. lobbying for space and collecting, collating
and presenting an knowledge base towards the benefit of all. greater good for
the greatest number is never an unattainable goal, one only has to try that much
harder.
officially writing to (G)LUGs might just pose some amount of problems though. as
far as i know, a majority of them are not registered as societies/bodies/bodies
corporate [my home www.ilug-cal.org is not ] and thus the legal formality of a
location arises. in that event, having region-based/state based FSUGs that act
in sync with FSF-india's policies and aims as well as form a nodal point of
contact towards developmental activities is most desirable. in west bengal,
fsf-westbengal has been conceived with that singular aim in mind. strengthening
the reach and sensitivity of FSF-india while providing a rich resource base of
developers, activists and enthusiasts. tathagata banerjee
(tathagatabanerjee(a)softhome.net) has taken the on the responsibilty of being the
coordinator of such a group (fsf-westbengal(a)yahoogroups.com) and as RMS, NG and
others will be aware (he is, i believe in mail communication with them) he plans
to develop the group into a strong platform for Free Software Advocacy under the
aegis of FSF-India
thanks for your patience in going through this mail, with today being the
bengali new year, i can only hope and pray that the coming year be one of
success and achievements for us all
warm regards
sankarshan
-----------------------
http://www.ilug-cal.org - A Brave Gnu world
http://www.asiaosc.org - Open Source & Free Software
-----------------------
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 4/10/03
Free Software is going to be the subject of a consultation being organised
by UNDP. Please get in touch with shruti.gupta(a)undp.org with your
suggestions. Thanks! FN
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Shruti Gupta wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The report of the Bangalore Consultation on ICTs for Development (11-12
> March 2003) is ready and up on our website.
>
> You can access it at the UNDP website
> <http://www.undp.org.in/events/ict-bglr/>
>
> The website also hosts speakers' presentations. So all of those who
> have not sent us their presentations in the soft format, please do so
> now!
>
> Work is now on for the second consultation. We are looking at the
> themes of 'Open Source and Free Software' and the 'Role of the Media in
> Promoting ICTs for Development'. Please feel free to send us your ideas
> and comments for the same.
>
> We look forward to hearing from you, and seeing you all soon for the
> next event!
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
> Shruti Gupta
> Junior co-ordinator
> Project on ICTs for Development
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick Noronha (FN) | http://www.fredericknoronha.net
Freelance Journalist | http://www.bytesforall.orghttp://goalinks.pitas.com | http://joingoanet.shorturl.comhttp://linuxinindia.pitas.com | http://www.livejournal.com/users/goalinks
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL : http://glugt.linuxisle.com
tux GNU/Linux User Group - Trichy
GNU
* Main Menu *
[1]GLUG Home
[2]Projects
[3]Downloads
[4]GNU/Linux Links
[5]Meetings
[6]Mailing Lists
[7]Credits
* GNU/Linux Docs *
[8]GNU/Linux Workshop
[9]Tips/HOWTOS
* Reminder *
GLUG-T Meeting
Date: 20th April, Sunday
Time: 9:30 to 12:30pm
Venue: Accel IT Academy Thillainagar
[10]* Help Needed *
LCD Projector
Domain Name & Web Space
Meeting Place
Welcome to GNU/Linux User Group - Trichy
The GLUG-T is based at Trichy, a small city at the heart of
Tamil Nadu, a state in India. The user group aims to promote free
software in its spirit. We meet every 3rd Sunday on a decided place.
(Check out our [11]meetings page for the next meeting's venue.) In our
meetings we discuss both technical and philosophical issues related to
free software. We welcome everybody interested in free software and
the GNU/Linux OS to join our user group.
Joining the GLUG-T:
You can join us by subscribing to our mailing list
glug_t(a)freelists.org and attending our meetings. To subscribe to the
mailing list send a mail to [12]glug_t-request(a)freelists.org with
'subscribe' as subject.
Contacting Us:
.In case the information you are looking for is not in this website
you can mail to [13]glug_t(a)linuxmail.org.
* Cookie *
* Poll *
Which is your favourite Desktop Environment?
(_) Gnome
(_) KDE
(_) Text Mode
(_) Others
[14][ Results ] Vote
Powered By * GNU/Linux * EMACS * pHp * GIMP * Apache *
Site Maintained by [15]Web Admin
glugt_webadmin(a)linuxmail.org
Dileep posts :
>> We are the 1st FSUG in India
Sure, we are. The 1st FSUG in India which has a majority of GNUheads.
The GNU angle is more important to us.
>>--Forwarded message from "Nagarjuna G." <nagarjun(a)hbcse.tifr.res.in> --
>>
>>>>>Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:39:28 +0530
>>>>>From: "Nagarjuna G." <nagarjun(a)hbcse.tifr.res.in>
>>>>>Subject: Re: [Fsf-friends] Re: Forming FSUGs in the country
>>>>>To: Arko Provo Mukherjee <arkoprovo(a)peacefulaction.org>
>>>>>> We are not going against GLUG if we form FSUG. We can go hand
>>>>>> in hand with them. If it is FSF, it should be FSUG.
I have seen RMS insist that if possible, the Group be named as a
GNU/Linux User Group instead of calling it as a Free Software User
Group. That way, the idea of freedom in computing can be conveyed
much easily.
>>>>> pass a resolution in one of their meetings and announces on
>>>>> their web page
Existing `Linux' User Groups should move away and rename themselves as
GNU/Linux User Groups and resolve in their meetings to refuse to
support `non-free' software. This need be reflected in their Web
Pages too.
>>>>> Such groups will not encourage the promotion of non-free
>>>>> software under any free operating system, while promoting the
>>>>> use of free software anywhere.
The Group should stress the importance of the GNU Project first. Such
groups should discuss the ethical aspects of Free Software and the
finer nuances of `what free really means to a computer user ?'.
Licensing issues should be discussed as well. They may even discuss
how free software can help businesses and stress that free GNU
software was born mainly for preserving user freedoms rather than to
help businesses.....
--
ragOO, VU2RGU :: Visit us at http://symonds.net/~fsug-kochi/
Helping to keep the Air-Waves FREE Amateur GNU Radio
Helping to keep your Software FREE the GNU Project
Helping to keep the W W W FREE Debian GNU/${kernel}
Hi,
It is very sad that LFY doesnt get a clue of what Free Software all
about. See the article on 'IDE Tools for Linux'(April issue), it talks
of 6 IDE tools, only 2 of them are Free Software or even `open' source.
LFY ignored even the IDE from India, Anjuta.
Now looking into CD. It comes with 5 OSs and two of them clearly
proprietary. CD says that all of them are Freeware no clear distinction.
Hope that LFY will correct the situation and clear distinction will be
made about Free and Proprietary softwares in GNU/Linux. Confusing
between Free and non-Free is worser than supporting proprietary.
software.
Arun.
--
"Freedom received through the efforts of others, however benevolent,
cannot be retained when such efforts are withdrawn."
-- Mahatma Gandhi