Hello,
I choose FC4's full installation option and removed localization and
internalization stuff.But FC4 is not installing all the packages. For
example anaconda is not instilling Swat. Is it bug with FC4?
Thank you
Regards,
Komal
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:45:00 0530, scrapo(a)saswatabanerjee.com <
scrapo(a)saswatabanerjee.com> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
> Subj: Re: [ILUG-BOM] [OT] MTNL Triband
> Date: Sun 2 Oct 2005 16:32
> Size: 554 bytes
> To: "GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India" <linuxers(a)mm.ilug-bom.org.in>
>
> On Sunday 02 October 2005 10:05, Vinayakam Murugan wrote:
> > A person from Airtel Broadband had visited our place to take
> > permission for installing their digital boxes which will be used for
> > their phone and broadband connection. He was mentioning that they are
> > planning to offer unlimited download / upload at Rs 350/-. However
> > without anything on paper, that sounds highly improbable.
>
> Airtel broadband? Is there such a thing existing in mumbai? I dont think
> so....
>
> Airtel has introduced land lines and broadband 2 months ago.
>
> Regards
> saswata
>
>
> --
> Dinesh A. Joshi
>
> --
> http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
>
>
>
> --
> http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
>
LOL! Check this link!!!
http://broadbandforum.in/Problem-t2684.html
--
Regards,
Sanket Medhi,
sanketmedhi [at] gmail.com <http://gmail.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
Subj: Re: [ILUG-BOM] [OT] MTNL Triband
Date: Sun 2 Oct 2005 16:32
Size: 554 bytes
To: "GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India" <linuxers(a)mm.ilug-bom.org.in>
On Sunday 02 October 2005 10:05, Vinayakam Murugan wrote:
> A person from Airtel Broadband had visited our place to take
> permission for installing their digital boxes which will be used for
> their phone and broadband connection. He was mentioning that they are
> planning to offer unlimited download / upload at Rs 350/-. However
> without anything on paper, that sounds highly improbable.
Airtel broadband? Is there such a thing existing in mumbai? I dont think
so....
Airtel has introduced land lines and broadband 2 months ago.
Regards
saswata
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
--
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
Greetings,
We are interested in hiring Java programmers (preferred RDBMS- mysql/oracle)
with two years experience. The remuneration will be at par with industry
standards and include working on offshore projects.
Please contact with your latest resume at fmlit(a)fleetship.com.
Best regards,
Nikhil
The subject header should be MisINFO
Typical M$ shit.
"One argument against product liability for software is that it would destroy the industry by placing unacceptable costs on developers, and that it would wipe out the open source movement in its current form since there is no way an organisation like the Mozilla Foundation could distribute Firefox for free under those terms.
But if a system is unjust then it should not be supported, and an unwillingness to strip undeserved privileges from a group, however noble their cause, is not sufficient reason to maintain the current dispensation."
He forgets that closed software vendor liability is zero (they use a doc known as EULA to tell u this) and u pay a fat sum for it.
rgds
jtd
-----Original Message-----
From: sherlock(a)vsnl.com
Subj: [ILUG-BOM] [INFO] Software Liabilities.
Date: Sun 2 Oct 2005 10:35
Size: 800 bytes
To: "GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India" <linuxers(a)mm.ilug-bom.org.in>
The subject header should be MisINFO
Typical M$ shit.
"One argument against product liability for software is that it would destroy the industry by placing unacceptable costs on developers, and that it would wipe out the open source movement in its current form since there is no way an organisation like the Mozilla Foundation could distribute Firefox for free under those terms.
But if a system is unjust then it should not be supported, and an unwillingness to strip undeserved privileges from a group, however noble their cause, is not sufficient reason to maintain the current dispensation."
He forgets that closed software vendor liability is zero (they use a doc known as EULA to tell u this) and u pay a fat sum for it.
Actually he is complaining against closed source / proprietory software. He said that some people raise the matter of open-source to stop moving to software liability.
And his argument is valid. Even open source has to be ready to take responsility for the code they right. I remember being told how debian tests every package thoroughly before putting it in stable version. That is the correct way to work.
Saswata
rgds
jtd
--
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
Hi all,
I want to integrate tomcat 5.5 with apache. I alreday have tomcat version 3.2 i jst want to upgrade tomcat version to 5.5 i have jdk 1.4 and servelts installed kindly guide me. I have been googleing and getting help. still would like to get help from you ppls if any of you have done the same in past
'SKY MAY BE LIMIT FOR SOME ONE , BUT SKY LIMITS ME'
Thanks & regards
Amit Karia