Hi,
I was busy.
Happy Parsi New Year.
JTD replied whose reply I intepret as follows that Windows (am I
correct ---- does not have a secure kernel like UNIX)---- then how is
Windows security done.
Now, for all over Mumbai/INDIA, WIFI can we say that we have to have a
secure kernel ---- for banks can one advocate a "develop new
applications / enhancements over LINUX development tool with Windows
running on top of LINUX using the emulator VIRTUALBOX which is open
source).
Now the key issue is that has anyone taken a software project of say
one year and shown it is cheaper to develop using Windows v/s LINUX
for the "easy to use touted set of Windows tool v/s which tool set to
use of LINUX".
Not over the entire life-cycle, but just over six months time to go
live. What if we take a fresh graduate of say visual basic/ASP from a
windows school and put him thru linux programming ------ how will the
development cycle be cheaper/prototyping cycle be cheaper.
Erach