Morning Mr. Sudhir,
With reference to your article on page 32 "Dell Latitude D600",
Praveen has done a wonderful job about the same.
But when it comes to evaluating the Laptop with Linux, i should
there's much to desired. He tries the same with Lindows 3.0 and states
the same has failed to work with GUI/X.
I do understand that an esteemed publication like yours needs to
platform neutral and present the facts as-is. On this side of the line
we just expect well researched facts/figures. In case your reporters
need help on the same they can always dash couple of emails to me. I do
take the onus of helping out if/when possible. But would humbly request
well researched articles/facts/figures.
One small bad review here....and one there all adds up to a mega mix
of publicity we can do without. Just to let you know
sir.......personally i use Red Hat Linux on my Dell Latitude and i am
more than pleased.
Trevor
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 21:55, Sudhir wrote:
> Mr.Warren,
> Thanks a lot. That was due to a goof up after the article was passed to the
> designers. We'll be reproducing the actual column for the benefit of our
> readers in the next issue
> Regds
> sudhir
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trevor Warren [mailto:trevorwarren@softhome.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:32 PM
> To: Sudhir
> Cc: Trevor Warren
> Subject: RE: clarifications on article in NC pg 24-25
>
> Mr. Narsimhan,
>
> Was a bit surprised also to find. Page 24 and 25 with the same article
> but different authors. Guess you didn't want that rite?.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:50, Sudhir wrote:
> > Dear Mr.Warren,
> > Thanks a lot for pointing out the error. My apologies for the same. We
> shall
> > be carrying a corrigendum in the next issue along with your letter. Let me
> > assure you that, we at Network Computing, sincerely believe that our role
> is
> > to provide credible information to our readers and not to evangelize
> > software, whether it is from Microsoft or from the open source community.
> It
> > is only with active feedback from readers like yourself that we'll be able
> > to roll out a better product. Please feel free to share your observations
> > with us from time to time.
> > Thanks and regards
> > Sudhir Narasimhan
> > Editor
> > Network Computing
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trevor Warren [mailto:trevorwarren@softhome.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:20 AM
> > To: sudhir_narasimhan(a)jasubhai.com
> > Cc: Tushar Burman; Trevor Warren; Gnu-Linux users Group of Goa; glug
> > kolhapur; Gnu-Linux Users Group of bombay; Dr. Nagarjuna; Fredrick Noronha
> > Subject: clarifications on article in NC
> >
> >
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > This mail is in reference to your article "BuzzCut", page 12, Network
> > Computing, July 2003.
> >
> > ".............As though the SCO v/s IBM standoff wasn't enough, the
> > Linux battle is going to get murkier as thousands of underlying patented
> > codes from different sources lie within its source. How these patents
> > will affect SCO's claims of intellectual property infringements remains
> > to be seen."
> >
> > This morning was to jolt me so bad that i decided to pen this following
> > email and give your publication a piece of my mind. Sir....these lines
> > as commented in your esteemed magazine don't seem to be well researched.
> > I have been an avid reader for a long time now but such attrocious
> > comments i won't stand for.
> >
> > Besides, i also suggest your publication takes sometime to review the
> > story on how Microsoft post alignment with SCO has got the frailing
> > victim to sue IBM and create the ensuing stir in markets world wide. It
> > just goes to show the kind of cheap tricks mircosoft will play towards
> > creating FUD about the Open Source and Free Software Movement.
> >
> > Rather than get further from the crux of the issue, my humble
> > suggestion would be to give an impartial look to the SCO v/s IBM story
> > in your coming edition since you have already taken the trouble to
> > harness FUD in IT users nationwide with your article. It indeed would
> > help provide readers with clarity on the ETHICS of Microsoft and other
> > Bullies in the market place.
> >
> > PN: * The comments don't represent views of my Employer.
> > * I am not the OFFICIAL MOUTH PEICE mouth peice for the OS-FSF
> > community.
> >
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > --
> > ( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> > /~\ __ twarren(a)redhat.com __ /~\
> > | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> > |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> > \___________________________________/
> --
> ( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> /~\ __ twarren(a)redhat.com __ /~\
> | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> \___________________________________/
--
( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
/~\ __ twarren(a)redhat.com __ /~\
| \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
|_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
\___________________________________/