Sometime on Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:30:18AM +0000, Dinesh Joshi said:
The editor of PCQ has responded that they have _not_ violated the GNU GPL as they have modified only anaconda and the init scripts of FC4. _I'm stumped_ :O How in the world have they "remastered" an entire distro without modifying anything other than anaconda and the init scripts? They claim to have distributed the sources of anaconda along with PCQLinux 2006. I believe them.
From the link(s) you have given, the editor, Mr. Krishna Kumar claims
that they have taken a legal advice from a whetted by legal counsel, conversant with the GPL.
And that their customers should get sources of packages bundled in their distribution from the internet urls of respective projects.
And the threats galore. Now they think someone opening their mouth is defamation... >_<
Yeah, if their customers ask questions and complain then it amounts to defamation. Strange.
Anurag