On 12-Feb-07, at 3:51 PM, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
ok - in hairsplitting legalistic terms I am being unreasonable, but would warn any users that the lack of transparency here may lead to problems tomorrow.
Agreed.. and if you do not get a satisfactory response and commitment from openlx (preferably through a private communication) then kindly enlighten the rest of us.. who then ought to give them some nice *unwanted* publicity..
anyway a guy i know is downloading it right now, and if he doesnt get the source we will take appropriate action