DONT CC ME. I am already on the list.
On Sunday 07 August 2005 13:58, nadarajan poniah wrote:
From where? For the same price you can get far more with an i386.
From where? From their website, of course. You can buy online.
Let's see the costing. 1) bank charges for TT Rs.500 2) Fedex $80 3) customs @36% 4) Octroi@5% (The bmc will get to you after two yrs and demand pathan interest on the principal).
((129+80)*44*1.36*1.05)+500=13631
You may be able to avoid bank charges by risking your credit card details online or paying paypal their commission.
And because you say you will only have 64MB flash, then what you are trying to build will still need a PC to host your mp3 collection. And that is of course the same as the SqueezeBox.
By flash he meant pendrive. If u use uclinux you will fit into 32mb, leaving 32 mb free. And u have 4 usb ports to connect a pendrive.
You must be joking again. Go look at the price per gigabyte.
Price per GB btwn slim box and x86. It's going to stay the same. But the x86 has the advantage of a usb connection permitting many more options like pendrive, and an ide i/f which (afaik) the slimbox does not.
Did you even bother to read the details of the squeezebox? You obviously didn't.
I always check facts before faffing.The slimbox is about 7 months old (afair). And was not cost effective then at $200 (afair). It isnt any better now.
Not unless you want the low power consumption and portability as the prime design goals.
Huh? Are you saying the squeezebox doesn't have low power consumption? How does miniITX introduce portability?
Please read the thread. U seem to have missed the earlier discussion. Power consumption and ready out of the box is the only advantage the slimbox has.
Please try to write in a way such that you can convey information.
Suggest u read a little more, particularly this thread.
rgds jtd