24 May
2007
24 May
'07
2:58 p.m.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:52:36 +0530, Rony ronbillypop@yahoo.co.uk said:
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
BTW, your proposed full-ubuntu precedes ubuntu and is called debian.
I have used both. Debian is not user friendly as Ubuntu. Debian is raw power. Ubuntu is tamed.
While I understand that is the stereotype (Debian isunfriendly!), do you happen to have concrete example where Debian is lacking (apart from offering more choices to the user)?
If such lacunae are reported, perhaps the next release areDebian might turn out to be better.
I slightly differ on this.. why doesn't debian (being the upstream provider for ubuntu) take feedback from the ubuntu community as well? Redhat does this for fedora/centos/scientific.. they even invited centos developers to collaborate on EPEL (though things are still being worked out).