Re: [ILUG-BOM] why linux(and not GNU/Linux)

- from the article:

By calling it "GNU/Linux", you are giving credit to GNU, which *is* a part contributor to the distribution, but by no stretch of imagination the *only* (or even the largest) one.

GNU can be considered the largest contributor. Here you're comparing GNU software with *all* non-GNU open source software that comes with a distro. But it's quite possible that no _single_ group (Apache etc.) contributes as much as GNU. If that is the case, then GNU *is* the largest contributor.

It's unfair to compare GNU with everything non-GNU put together.

BTW I still feel Linux is a sexy name ;) Sounds better than any other OS name out there.

Manish