2 Jan
2009
2 Jan
'09
6:17 a.m.
On Friday 02 Jan 2009 11:24:00 am Praveen A wrote:
2009/1/1 Kenneth Gonsalves lawgon@au-kbc.org:
because there is a dispute about the meaning of the terms. There is no dispute about the meaning of the terms 'commercial' and 'proprietary'.
If it were that simple RMS would not have to maintain this. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial
RMS has a habit of making simple things complicated ;-) I am quite sure that nokia knows the difference between commercial and proprietary and insist on the commercial license for commercial free software.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/