On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Raj Mathurraju@linux-delhi.org wrote:
those ends. In all the years I've spent interacting with the OSI, I've yet to see an example of someone from OSI advocating proprietary software.
They do not advocate proprietary software. They have without doubt advocated open source software. They just believe that they can coexist.
As for licences, the list of licences considered free by the FSF (http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/) and the list of licences considered open source by the OSI (http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) are more or less the same, so please don't mix up licensing issues into this discussion.
Ok, I stand corrected on the BSD license bit.