On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:36 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tuesday 14 Jul 2009 10:27:17 am Krishnakant wrote:
Yes, after all the emails and investigating in the issue further it seems that the alternative suggested by him was not the only way and perhaps not sufficient enough.
I think he gave the correct advice and you misunderstood him. He probably said something like 'a dedicated postgres user', which meant a special user created by postgres that is dedicated to this particular database. You misunderstood it as 'the dedicated postgres user' which means the user named postgres.
Yes perhaps the wrong words for the right solution. As a side note we indeed were looking at your ticket but did not close it because there were other major problems which we were facing and since we did not get any volantary support for deb packages and rpm, it is totally on me right now and that modules is also on my hands. We are also implementing schemas for projects , sub-projects and account heads so that large organisations fnd it easy to continue their methodology of seprate accounts bank, cash and other accounts for individual projects.
happy hacking. Krishnakant.