6 Jul
2009
6 Jul
'09
5:51 a.m.
On Monday 06 Jul 2009, narendra sisodiya wrote:
If redhat is bundling some with GPL software and making a new OS which has restriction, this is truly valid scenario. You can say "Redhat Linux" is not a Open Soruce Linux OS, It is commerical Linux OS.
Please correct me where am wrong !!
Apologies in advance for nitpicking, but Open Source and Commercial aren't opposites. Open Source can (and must) be commercial. If you want to contrast, the opposite of Open Source is "Proprietary".
Regards,
-- Raju
--
Raj Mathur raju@kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/
GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves