31 Dec
2008
31 Dec
'08
12:45 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Kushal Das kushaldas@gmail.com wrote:
Aaah ... I see now that my last point was wrong. Clearly, the actual
license
of QT is the final word. Seems like the web-site has just been tuned to exhort commercial companies to purchase the "commercial" license. No more qualms on this issue ... thanks.
It is *NOT* QT , it is Qt.
Double-touché * *:-)* *