On Sunday 02 July 2006 11:46 am, Rony wrote:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 06:23:14PM +0530, Philip Tellis wrote:
Sometime Today, KG cobbled together some glyphs to say:
dunno about semantics - what i call a static site is where all the pages are created before hand, not on the fly
right, and how does that affect whether it was written well or not? if the developer who developed the site has some clue, he'll write good markup. if he doesn't, he'll make mashed potatoes with vangi bath.
:) I would rate a site (as a visitor) on its ease of opening up in : the browser
and the ease with which a visitor can navigate the site for the information he/she is looking for.
That is a completely different criteria. UI and graphics layout. Nothing to do with writing html or scriping. Most make the mistake of asking coders to design a website. Or even worse ask graphic layout shops to create websites.