On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:28:33 +0530, Dhawal Doshy dhawal@netmagicsolutions.com said:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:52:36 +0530, Rony ronbillypop@yahoo.co.uk said:
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
BTW, your proposed full-ubuntu precedes ubuntu and is called debian.
I have used both. Debian is not user friendly as Ubuntu. Debian is raw power. Ubuntu is tamed.
While I understand that is the stereotype (Debian is unfriendly!), do you happen to have concrete example where Debian is lacking (apart from offering more choices to the user)?
If such lacunae are reported, perhaps the next release are Debian might turn out to be better.
I slightly differ on this.. why doesn't debian (being the upstream provider for ubuntu) take feedback from the ubuntu community as well?
I don't recall prohibiting Ubuntu users from reporting flaws in Debian. In my experience, though, the so called feedback to Debian from Ubuntu is far more lip service than reality.
manoj