On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 11:12 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tuesday 14 Jul 2009 11:05:20 am Krishnakant wrote:
I think he gave the correct advice and you misunderstood him. He probably said something like 'a dedicated postgres user', which meant a special user created by postgres that is dedicated to this particular database. You misunderstood it as 'the dedicated postgres user' which means the user named postgres.
Yes perhaps the wrong words for the right solution. As a side note we indeed were looking at your ticket but did not close it
the one thing you must do is keep a close watch on tickets. Either accept them or reject them immediately. This encourages people to file tickets. They do not expect the ticket to be resolved immediately. They are just happy to know that they are not being ignored. Even rejection as wontfix or not a bug is also acceptable, but do it fast. Also I suggest that all issues you are facing should be filed as tickets. One ticket per issue. And if there is sufficient detail in the ticket you may be surprised to find patches appearing too.
A couple of tickets have been added and your ticket is excepted (it is on me as usual ). So you can follow it up. even mehul's ticket has been excepted. happy hacking. Krishnakant.