9 Jul
2009
9 Jul
'09
11:02 p.m.
2009/7/9 Rony gnulinuxist@gmail.com:
If it was not provided legally by RedHat then it is a duplicate. Anyway it is not just a trade mark violation, it is an illegal copy that cannot be installed on other systems.
The legal basis is http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_rha_eula.html which does not prevent making duplicate copies. If it is not a copyright violation (GPL grants this right to copy) and not a trademark violation (you agree to this already), it is perfectly legal copy.
- Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now!
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign