On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 06:38:46 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves lawgon@au-kbc.org said:
On 18-Feb-07, at 10:18 PM, nipra wrote:
Sincere apologies for making offending and personal comments in my posts. Please post your reply. To clear the confusion, I would like to make it clear that Open Source software for me is a software released under a license approved by Open Source Initiative. I don't have any personal interpretation of Open Source software.
i agree with you there - however I feel that this could be further diluted to cover the case of scilab.
What is it that you feel can be diluted? If you are referring to the definition of OSS, then diluting that definition is not your call. And until the people who _can_ actually change the definition do so, scilab is not open source software -- and not free software either.
manoj