"We are forced to admit that, with the use of certificates, stickers, and serial numbers, Windows vastly outpaces Linux security out of the box." This sounds more like the author was forced 2 write with a gun sticking 2 his 'kanpatti" lol
----- Original Message ----- From: "Linux Power" powerpc5@yahoo.com To: trevor.w@pvision.biz; "GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India" linuxers@mm.ilug-bom.org.in Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:25 AM Subject: Re: [ILUG-BOM] Windows is more secure than Linux out of the box
just read the conclusion which says "We are forced to admit that, with the use of certificates, stickers, and serial numbers, Windows vastly outpaces Linux security out of the box."
this is unfucking belivable. what a retard. its not even fuuny. its pathetic.
--- Trevor Warren trevor.w@pvision.biz wrote:
Proven: Windows is more secure than Linux out of the box Sunday March 21, 2004 - [ 05:10 AM GMT ] Topics: Humor By: David 'cdlu' Graham
After years of petty squabbling between the most innovative company in the software industry and a few pesky upstart hippie developers over which of their operating systems is more secure, the verdict is finally in. Microsoft's flagship Windows software is more secure than Linux. You can demonstrate this for yourself just as we did.
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html