Praveen A wrote:
(Client forces top posting)
How does installing rhel on another machine violates trademark?
Logos or name is not misused. You are just calling a spade as spade. You are not calling an axe as spade.
If it was not provided legally by RedHat then it is a duplicate. Anyway it is not just a trade mark violation, it is an illegal copy that cannot be installed on other systems.
On Jul 8, 2009 2:43 AM, "Rony Bill" gnulinuxist@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/8/09, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote: > 2009/7/7 Rony < gnulinuxist@gmail.com>: >> want to ... Making a personal copy for preserving the original CD from scratches is not the issue here. It is implied that the purpose of copying an RHEL CD is to install it on other systems that are not within the coverage of the paid-for installation.