22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
3:59 a.m.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Kenneth Gonsalveslawgon@au-kbc.org wrote:
where is the source for this allegation? In the definition of Open Source given in the link above, they make 10 points and none of them 'making entry easier for business'. You may not like Open Source or may disagree with it's goals, but you cannot mislabel it as you are doing. This is the definition:
No, you're misunderstanding my point. It does not make entry easier for business. It does two things:
1) Put things in a "business friendly" language. It's like making meat flavoured spinach to please the dog. 2) Includes licenses that do not preserve the freedom of the developer
--
Siddhesh Poyarekar
http://siddhesh.in