Sameer Shinde wrote
It doesn't meen that I hate windows. If it has some goodies, it has it. Accept it. There is no harm in that. Nobody is going to Kill you for that. After being on the list for quite a long time I found that, some ppl on the list are not ready to accept it.
You reeeally need to do some serious reading. These so called features are individual tastes. If you think that these are features read Philip's mail. Features are those which comply with standards and work universally. In this respect both Libre and closed software have limitations. However Libre software allows you the means to correct any deficiences, closed software actively prevents you from dicovering and publishing such deficiencies.
Some ppl say that Linux is free & so not is windows. But can they tell me what wod they have done if linux & all of its goodies were also not free? They say windows is buggy, even I say. But then everything have some bugs ( even human beings ) Nothing is perfect. We are developer atleast we should understand this.
are you confusing free and libre?. Libre software is buggy but allows U to correct it. Closed software is far more buggy BUT actively prevents u from discovering, correcting or publishing thes bugs.
I/we do some sort of programming & need to test it on different OS But for a general user who is only interested in playing games, surfing web & doing some work in word excel. Why should he swithch to any other OS if he is getting MS for free ( pirated )? There is no reason for that.
Please carefully read the lug mail archives there is lot's of stuff there which will explain in detail the real issues at hand. Do not fool ur self into beliveing that this is abt a button here and a double click there.
Note : This doesn't mean that I'm in favour of Win & opposing Linux I just want to clear a thing that If something is good, let it be good, do not blame it. Rather try to make your system to be good.
Yeah try explaining that to Billy baba.
rgds jtdsouza@softhome.net
At 11:20 even 9/5/02 -0600, JTD wrote:
You reeeally need to do some serious reading. These so called features are individual tastes. If you think that these are features read Philip's mail. Features are those which comply with standards and work universally.
dictionary : feature - A prominent aspect of something. A feature could be anything *you* wanted to put in. That is why the patent system came it. Patents allowed people to put in *features* which other could *not* i.e. not universally available. (The moral/ethical aspects of the patenting system is an open and completely different discussion.)
are you confusing free and libre?. Libre software is buggy but allows U to correct it. Closed software is far more buggy BUT actively prevents u from discovering, correcting or publishing thes bugs.
There are tremendous advantages of open source. But on what basis do you say that closed software are far more buggy ??? Why makes such comments that have weak basis and which put the open source movement in bad light? Because this plainly makes out that the source may be open but the mind is closed.
FYI, there have been IBM mainframes with "closed" OS as well as the software which have been running robustly for more than a decade in many a bank.
Yeah try explaining that to Billy baba.
I would love to, could you arrange a meeting please? I also hope he gives me some money...
regards, quasi