Hi,
I would like to do the Redhat-8.0 installation remotely(since the machine don't have CDROM)
I have done several Redhat-7.x remote installations using NFS method.
I created "bootnet.img "
# dd if=/mnt/cdrom/images/bootnet.img of=/dev/fd0 bs=512
When i boot machine from this floppy the installation stops showing "The Second stage of install which you have selected does not match the boot disk your using..."
What went wrong ?
-Dilip --------
Sometime Today, Dilip M assembled some asciibets to say:
I have done several Redhat-7.x remote installations using NFS method.
I created "bootnet.img "
# dd if=/mnt/cdrom/images/bootnet.img of=/dev/fd0 bs=512
When i boot machine from this floppy the installation stops showing "The Second stage of install which you have selected does not match the boot disk your using..."
perhaps you are using bootnet for RH 7.3 while trying to install RH 8.0.
Just curious, why did you go for RH 8 when it is no longer supported?
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:23:35 +0530 (IST), Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@gmx.net wrote: [...]
When i boot machine from this floppy the installation stops showing "The Second stage of install which you have selected does not match the boot disk your using..."
perhaps you are using bootnet for RH 7.3 while trying to install RH 8.0.
No - have re-checked the img.I'm using 'bootnet.img' created explicitly from Redhat-8.0 media itself....
Just curious, why did you go for RH 8 when it is no longer supported?
I'm trying Exim-mailserver on this :)
Sometime Today, Dilip M assembled some asciibets to say:
Just curious, why did you go for RH 8 when it is no longer supported?
I'm trying Exim-mailserver on this :)
so why RH8?
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:09:32 +0530 (IST), Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@gmx.net wrote:
Sometime Today, Dilip M assembled some asciibets to say:
Just curious, why did you go for RH 8 when it is no longer supported?
I'm trying Exim-mailserver on this :)
so why RH8?
than which version is better and FREE ? redhat 9 ?
Sometime Today, Dilip M assembled some asciibets to say:
than which version is better and FREE ? redhat 9 ?
how about debian sid, or mandrake - both are supported well. there are many more to choose from, all with varying levels of support.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:08:40 +0530 (IST), Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@gmx.net wrote:
Sometime Today, Dilip M assembled some asciibets to say:
than which version is better and FREE ? redhat 9 ?
how about debian sid, or mandrake - both are supported well. there are many more to choose from, all with varying levels of support.
WELL!! i'll try to give a try in FREE time :)
Debian is FREE but not mandrake.....
On 19/02/04 19:07 +0530, Dilip M wrote:
than which version is better and FREE ?
If you like the Debian way, Debian. Otherwise, Gentoo and Slack are good choices for servers.
Devdas Bhagat
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 07:07:36PM +0530, Dilip M wrote: <snip>
than which version is better and FREE ? redhat 9 ?
If you really want something like redhat, I'd suggest fedora core 1. Otherwise, there are plenty of other Non-RH options that others have already suggested.
Bhargav.
Sorry for the line-length.
Bhargav.
» -----Original Message----- » From: linuxers-bounces@mm.ilug-bom.org.in On Behalf Of Dilip M » Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:57 AM » I created "bootnet.img " » # dd if=/mnt/cdrom/images/bootnet.img of=/dev/fd0 bs=512 » When i boot machine from this floppy the installation stops showing
I think you have just copied the initial boot sector with the bs=512 option.
you need to use "bs=1440k count=1" HTH
Thanks and Regards, Kiran Ghag Web Page: http://kiran7.freeservers.com
_____
While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:56:49 +0530, K i r @ n G h a g kiran.ghag@patni.com wrote:
» -----Original Message----- » From: linuxers-bounces@mm.ilug-bom.org.in On Behalf Of Dilip M » Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:57 AM » I created "bootnet.img " » # dd if=/mnt/cdrom/images/bootnet.img of=/dev/fd0 bs=512 » When i boot machine from this floppy the installation stops showing
I think you have just copied the initial boot sector with the bs=512 option.
you need to use "bs=1440k count=1" HTH
WORKED !!! THANKS KIRAN!!