Spam detection software, running on the system "web.space-kerala.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi ,Our government is churning out one hazardous bill after another. This time it is a bill called the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, and it's coming up for a vote in a couple of days. The bill lets U.S. corporations off the hook for any nuclear accidents they cause on Indian soil. They'd only have to pay a meagre amount, and Indian taxpayers would be stuck paying crores for the nuclear clean up and to compensate the victims. [...]
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.9 DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 Date: is 24 to 48 hours before Received: date 3.6 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.4 HTML_10_20 BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 1.1 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
Sorry for top posting, but what exactly was this ???
On 3/12/2010 3:08 PM, yogamegha@gmail.com wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system "web.space-kerala.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi ,Our government is churning out one hazardous bill after another. This time it is a bill called the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, and it's coming up for a vote in a couple of days. The bill lets U.S. corporations off the hook for any nuclear accidents they cause on Indian soil. They'd only have to pay a meagre amount, and Indian taxpayers would be stuck paying crores for the nuclear clean up and to compensate the victims. [...]
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.9 DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 Date: is 24 to 48 hours before Received: date 3.6 HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE BODY: HTML contains far too many close tags -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.4 HTML_10_20 BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 1.1 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Saswata Banerjee scrapo@saswatabanerjee.com wrote:
Sorry for top posting, but what exactly was this ???
Looks like someone mistakenly approved the post instead of rejecting it.
On 3/13/2010 10:49 PM, Mehul Ved wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Saswata Banerjee scrapo@saswatabanerjee.com wrote:
Sorry for top posting, but what exactly was this ???
Looks like someone mistakenly approved the post instead of rejecting it.
LOL yes, i can see that
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Saswata Banerjee < scrapo@saswatabanerjee.com> wrote:
On 3/13/2010 10:49 PM, Mehul Ved wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Saswata Banerjee scrapo@saswatabanerjee.com wrote:
Sorry for top posting, but what exactly was this ???
Looks like someone mistakenly approved the post instead of rejecting it.
LOL yes, i can see that -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
Well, that is a Greenpeace mailer which I think someone mistakenly sent to some list on the web.space-kerala.org domain, and somehow wound up on GLUG-Bom.
-
Easwar Hariharan -
Mehul Ved -
Saswata Banerjee -
yogamegha＠gmail.com