Dear all,
I have created libyahoo2 package for Debian. Anyone using Debian unstable can get it from there.
Or you can get source and build it your own from:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/liby/libyahoo2.html
Please report the issue on Debian BTS. Hope that I will not be flamed for this {OT}.
On 31-Jan-07, at 10:42 AM, Kartik Mistry wrote:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/liby/libyahoo2.html
Please report the issue on Debian BTS. Hope that I will not be flamed for this {OT}.
you will be flamed for labelling it OT when it is not
http://packages.qa.debian.org/liby/libyahoo2.html
Please report the issue on Debian BTS. Hope that I will not be flamed for this {OT}.
you will be flamed for labelling it OT when it is not
True :-)
Thanks Kartik :-)
Regards,
- vihan
On 31-Jan-07, at 12:13 PM, Vihan Pandey wrote:
you will be flamed for labelling it OT when it is not
True :-)
Thanks Kartik :-)
i think he labelled it OT because he knows that OT is where the action is. I propose that we ban all guys who label non-OT stuff as OT for the sole purpose of getting attention.
i think he labelled it OT because he knows that OT is where the action is. I propose that we ban all guys who label non-OT stuff as OT for the sole purpose of getting attention.
Why ban when we can flame ;-) i think that will get even MORE attention.
Regards,
- vihan
On 1/31/07, Vihan Pandey vihanpandey@gmail.com wrote:
i think he labelled it OT because he knows that OT is where the action is. I propose that we ban all guys who label non-OT stuff as OT for the sole purpose of getting attention.
Another suggestion is off-topic message should have literal "[OT]" and not "[OT for some]". In that case It should be written as "[OT][for some]".
This would make message filters work as expected. I filter on [OT], writing [OT for some] does not help my filters. This could also be written in list guidelines.
Thanks
Amish.
P.S. Please do not suggest me to filter on just "[OT".
-
Amish Mehta -
Kartik Mistry -
Kenneth Gonsalves -
Vihan Pandey