If anyone's interested, there's now a C# compiler for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
Written by Rhys Weatherley, and released under the GPL. Read the FAQ st http://www.southern-storm.com.au/pnet_faq.html before asking questions.
Home: http://www.southern-storm.com.au/portable_net.html
Philip
Sometime today, Philip S Tellis wrote:
If anyone's interested, there's now a C# compiler for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
I might consider contributing to pnetlib. I liked this - ``Pick a class, any class, implement it, and send me the changes.'' Simple.
BTW I was aware of Ximian's attempt at .Net. Didn't quite understand why they're not co-operating with this guy.
Manish J.
Hi all,
I have Primary DNS setup on Solaris While Secondary on Linux. If I forcefully synchronize them they get synchronized properly but if I try Automatic then they dont get synchronised.
what might be the problem?? I am a newbie in administration. so please bear with me.
bye Aseem
Hi aseem,
I guess you might not be incrementing the Serial no. while changing the DNS Record that is the problem of not getting synchronised automatically...
just increment the Serial No. every time you change the records.... i hope this might solve your problem
Best Regards, -Mitul Limbani (mitul 2 mitul.com) Aseem writes:
Hi all,
I have Primary DNS setup on Solaris While Secondary on Linux. If I forcefully synchronize them they get synchronized properly but if I try Automatic then they dont get synchronised.
what might be the problem?? I am a newbie in administration. so please bear with me.
bye Aseem
Linuxers mailing list Linuxers@mm.ilug-bom.org.in http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
--- Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@iname.com wrote:
If anyone's interested, there's now a C# compiler for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
Would anyone (outside M$ afficiandos) be interested?
Krishnan
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, S. Krishnan wrote:
If anyone's interested, there's now a C# compiler for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
Would anyone (outside M$ afficiandos) be interested?
Yes. Everyone should be interested. This same question was asked on freshmeat, and then answer is there to be read.
by Sam Kennedy - Mar 14th 2001 09:08:22 > why? > Well, .NET should be supported. World domination doesn't happen by rebuilding things, but by taking them over. This is a way for Opensource to take over .NET!!
by Rhys Weatherley - Mar 14th 2001 18:01:40 > why? > 1. Because we need to keep Microsoft honest on this stuff. We can't let them turn it into another "run the binary and trust us" system. The security issues are too great. Only the open source model can produce a truly secure system. 2. I like messing with parsers and runtimes and stuff. It's fun! :)
Philip
--- Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@iname.com wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, S. Krishnan wrote:
If anyone's interested, there's now a C#
compiler
for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
Would anyone (outside M$ afficiandos) be
interested?
Yes. Everyone should be interested. This same question was asked on freshmeat, and then answer is there to be read.
by Sam Kennedy - Mar 14th 2001 09:08:22 > why? > Well, .NET should be supported. World dominationdoesn't happen by rebuilding things, but by taking them over. This is a way for Opensource to take over .NET!!
And lose it all when M$ pulls the rug out from under our feet?
Krishnan
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Sometime today, S. Krishnan wrote:
by Sam Kennedy - Mar 14th 2001 09:08:22
why?
Well, .NET should be supported. World domination doesn't happen by rebuilding things, but by taking them over. This is a way for Opensource to take over .NET!!
And lose it all when M$ pulls the rug out from under our feet?
Please elaborate on this point and enlighten us. The effort is not dependent on Microsoft in any such way that "M$ can pull the rug out". You're being paranoid.
C# is going to be more of a standard than Java. Microsoft has submitted the C# spec. to the ECMA for standardisation. It's better than Sun, at least at face value.
It would be nice to have C# programs run on Windows and Linux alike. Remember, Linux needs more end-user apps, that are likely to be developed using C# `for Windows' over the next 2-3 years. With a few modifications, they'll run on Linux. Ximian is developing stuff for GUI apps in C# (that will again run on Windows out of the box). What more do you want?
Microsoft has already offered a .Net implementation for Linux under their shared-source licence. Here these guys are rewriting everything so as to be totally independent (GPL).
Manish J.
--- Manish Jethani cruisecoder@yahoo.com wrote:
Sometime today, S. Krishnan wrote:
by Sam Kennedy - Mar 14th 2001 09:08:22
why?
Well, .NET should be supported. World domination
doesn't
happen by rebuilding things, but by taking
them over.
This is a way for Opensource to take over .NET!!
And lose it all when M$ pulls the rug out from
under
our feet?
Please elaborate on this point and enlighten us. The effort is not dependent on Microsoft in any such way that "M$ can pull the rug out". You're being paranoid.
Not just me, a whole lot of others too. Track the posts on Linuxtoday et al, and you'll get my drift.
C# is going to be more of a standard than Java. Microsoft has submitted the C# spec. to the ECMA for standardisation. It's better than Sun, at least at face value.
Actually, I don't do Java, and probably will not do C# either, even if it is ported on Linux. So I guess I don't have any opinion either way as far as a comparison with Java goes. The thing I'm concerned about is not C# the language (there are lots of programming languages out there, each with its own reason for existence - or lack thereof), but rather Hailstorm, which is a part of .Net. M$ will have .Net users by the short and curlies here, and will not hesitate to pull the rug when it suits them, as it definitely will, when it finds opensource products grabbing mind and market share.
Think about it....
It would be nice to have C# programs run on Windows and Linux alike. Remember, Linux needs more end-user apps, that are likely to be developed using C# `for Windows' over the next 2-3 years. With a few modifications, they'll run on Linux. Ximian is developing stuff for GUI apps in C# (that will again run on Windows out of the box). What more do you want?
As I said before, it isn't the language I'm concerned about.
Microsoft has already offered a .Net implementation for Linux under their shared-source licence. Here these guys are rewriting everything so as to be totally independent (GPL).
Which will be compatible with Hailstorm for just as long as Microsoft wants it to be!
Anyway, I'm no expert on e-com, but am just worried about a possible scenario where MS manages to make everyone move to its standard - and then changes the standard.
Regards,
Krishnan
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
on 1/8/2001 3:07 PM, S. Krishnan at sri_krishnan@yahoo.com wrote:
but am just worried about a possible scenario where MS manages to make everyone move to its standard - and then changes the standard.
That will be the day they will be really dead...
~Mayuresh
On Tuesday 31 July 2001 16:09, Krishnan wrote:
--- Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@iname.com wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, S. Krishnan wrote:
If anyone's interested, there's now a C#
compiler
for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
Would anyone (outside M$ afficiandos) be
interested?
Yes. Everyone should be interested. This same question was asked on freshmeat, and then answer is there to be read.
by Sam Kennedy - Mar 14th 2001 09:08:22 > why? Well, .NET should be supported. World dominationdoesn't happen by rebuilding things, but by taking them over. This is a way for Opensource to take over .NET!!
And lose it all when M$ pulls the rug out from under our feet?
May not be very easy for M$ to do that. It is a risk that should be taken. One probable reason why the Ximian guys jumped on to .net is to piss off Sun who pulled out funding from the Ximian/whatever foundation. As long as Ximian stays out of M$ $ they should succeed in preventing any rug pulling and only have cops n robbers games to play.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Philip S Tellis wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, S. Krishnan wrote:
If anyone's interested, there's now a C# compiler for linux. It's packaged with portable.NET, a system for non-microsoft platforms.
Would anyone (outside M$ afficiandos) be interested?
2. I like messing with parsers and runtimes and stuff. It's fun! :)
I don't know what to do but I can write in C/C++. I am interested.
regards - --------------------------------------- Pankaj Jangid National Centre for Software Technology - ---------------------------------------
Hi everybody, I want to implement port forwarding on my firewall.Can anybody tell me how to do it?I am using ipchains for other stuff.Can anybody tell me how to write the rules for portforwarding. Thanks in Advance. Mahesh Gharat mahesh@megaeservices.com
-
Aseem -
jtdyahoo -
Mahesh Gharat -
Manish Jethani -
Mayuresh A Kathe -
Mitul Limbani -
Pankaj Jangid -
Philip S Tellis -
S. Krishnan