there used to be apt-proxy in woody, but i can't find it in sarge. i heard it is debarchiver is better, anybody has used it? or know how to configure it. i have one machine connected via T1 line and others are behind it, so to save on bandwidth i need these kind of tool. thanking you.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:39:58AM +0530, harshal@iucaa.ernet.in wrote:
there used to be apt-proxy in woody, but i can't find it in sarge. i heard it is debarchiver is better, anybody has used it? or know how to configure it. i have one machine connected via T1 line and others are behind it, so to save on bandwidth i need these kind of tool. thanking you.
I use apt-proxy from Sid all the time for about 30 or so machines in IIT-B. Works really well. The older 1.3x version seems to be in Woody and the newer 1.9x version in Sid. It should get into Sarge in due course. For now you can try using the one in Sid. Sorry I have no experiance with debarchiver, would love to hear from people who do.
i downloaded the apt-proxy 1.3 (there were some dep. prob. for 1.9), anyways i am not getting it to work. can u please send me the /etc/apt-proxy and the source.lists files ? thank you.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:39:58AM +0530, harshal@iucaa.ernet.in wrote:
there used to be apt-proxy in woody, but i can't find it in sarge. i heard it is debarchiver is better, anybody has used it? or know how to configure it. i have one machine connected via T1 line and others are behind it, so to save on bandwidth i need these kind of tool. thanking you.
I use apt-proxy from Sid all the time for about 30 or so machines in IIT-B. Works really well. The older 1.3x version seems to be in Woody and the newer 1.9x version in Sid. It should get into Sarge in due course. For now you can try using the one in Sid. Sorry I have no experiance with debarchiver, would love to hear from people who do.
-- Vip
ul Mathur
vipul[at]linux-delhi.org http://www.vipulmathur.org/
-- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
when i run apt-get update from clients , it gives error saying, 407 proxy autorication required
what does it mean?
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:39:58AM +0530, harshal@iucaa.ernet.in wrote:
there used to be apt-proxy in woody, but i can't find it in sarge. i heard it is debarchiver is better, anybody has used it? or know how to configure it. i have one machine connected via T1 line and others are behind it, so to save on bandwidth i need these kind of tool. thanking you.
I use apt-proxy from Sid all the time for about 30 or so machines in IIT-B. Works really well. The older 1.3x version seems to be in Woody and the newer 1.9x version in Sid. It should get into Sarge in due course. For now you can try using the one in Sid. Sorry I have no experiance with debarchiver, would love to hear from people who do.
-- Vipul Mathur vipul[at]linux-delhi.org http://www.vipulmathur.org/
-- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
i solved that problem , but the new problem ahs come up, it says 111 connection refused. i edited /etc/hosts.allow, but still didn't work.
when i run apt-get update from clients , it gives error saying, 407 proxy autorication required
what does it mean?
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:39:58AM +0530, harshal@iucaa.ernet.in wrote:
there used to be apt-proxy in woody, but i can't find it in sarge. i heard it is debarchiver is better, anybody has used it? or know how to configure it. i have one machine connected via T1 line and others are behind it, so to save on bandwidth i need these kind of tool. thanking you.
I use apt-proxy from Sid all the time for about 30 or so machines in IIT-B. Works really well. The older 1.3x version seems to be in Woody and the newer 1.9x version in Sid. It should get into Sarge in due course. For now you can try using the one in Sid. Sorry I have no experiance with debarchiver, would love to hear from people who do.
-- Vipul Mathur vipul[at]linux-delhi.org http://www.vipulmathur.org/
-- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:32:15PM +0530, harshal@iucaa.ernet.in wrote:
i solved that problem , but the new problem ahs come up, it says 111 connection refused. i edited /etc/hosts.allow, but still didn't work.
Maybe the answer lies in how you solved the first problem ... with the proxy authorization ... chance of confusion here between "apt-proxy" and the actual http / ftp prxy that the IUCAA network is running. Is this question related to apt-proxy or just a normal apt-get through a network proxy?
I assume "apt-get" said connection refused ... probably refused by the network proxy. Dunno how that would relate to /etc/hosts.allow ... whose hosts.allow did you change? Why? What changes did you make?
Can you paste the actual error message generated by apt-get?
Sameer.
this question is related to the apt-proxy, and not apt-get. each machine can go online and fecth packages.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:32:15PM +0530, harshal@iucaa.ernet.in wrote:
i solved that problem , but the new problem ahs come up, it says 111 connection refused. i edited /etc/hosts.allow, but still didn't work.
Maybe the answer lies in how you solved the first problem ... with the proxy authorization ... chance of confusion here between "apt-proxy" and the actual http / ftp prxy that the IUCAA network is running. Is this question related to apt-proxy or just a normal apt-get through a network proxy?
I assume "apt-get" said connection refused ... probably refused by the network proxy. Dunno how that would relate to /etc/hosts.allow ... whose hosts.allow did you change? Why? What changes did you make?
Can you paste the actual error message generated by apt-get?
Sameer.
Research Scholar, KReSIT, IIT Bombay http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~sameerds/
-- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.